In article , dennis@home scribeth thus
I think John Rumm's following post sums a lot of it up but to me it just seems --bloatware--, a new operating system for the sake of it or rather so Microsnot can sell more product under the guise that its better.
Suppose its OK if you just want to do very simple things on it but then again I can do very simple things on my WIN 2000 Pro installation and whatever I want to do and set up that does what I want .. it seems I'm forever arguing with the lone Vista PC round here whenever I want to do anything different. Apart from some fancy graphics its no better..
Every fecking time I do use it everything is considered a "security risk" and did I really know the severe consequences of deleting something!. It treats me like an idiot..
OK I suppose you can turn a lot of that junk off but whey should you need to do that ?..
A very poor system and one that I refuse to use. I'd prefer LINUX over that any day. And that seems to be getting better from the user POV.
Theres a small charity outfit around here who got pulled up about software issues on their donated PC's Now they run LINUX with Thunderbird, Firebox, Open Office etc. Initially they didn't like it but now they wonder why they didn't install those programmes first and what's more .. all free:))...