Many years later I built an electronic one from a circuit in, of all things, Wireless World, using pulse width speed control. It gave a beautiful smooth control, but at a 'station' the train would creep very slowly so you had to switch it off to bring it to a halt.
Well, not that way round we wouldn't...not 240v to 12v!
Yes...I had some of those. I remember a Practical Mechanics article (must have been in the 60s) where someone described his BEBOP - Battery Energised Boiler Operation Plant. When the mains failed, it would run the programmer and pump (little in the boiler itself I guess aparet from solenoids). He then did a Mark 2 which only cut in when the thermostat demanded heat.
I remember that with the standard rheostat type controllers, there was always a problem at low speeds with the voltage being so low, it was unable to overcome the contact resistances between track and train wheels/motor brushes etc..
Your electronic version applied the full 12v, but in short pulses - thus overcoming many of these problems. I remember reading about an improvement on that idea, which superimposed an even higher voltage to overcome high resistance contacts, but sourced from a high resistance.
The modern way is to just supply the voltage straight to the track and have the speed/direction controller next to the motor, each digitally addressable so that a number of engines can occupy the same bit of track and each separately controllable.
I know. But that wasn't what you appeared to be replying to...we used a rotary converter for the opposite operation...where an inverter might not be so sensible.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.