After being a die hard linux+ XFCE4 (window manager) user for years I
finally reinstalled Mint 17.1 and decided to give KDE4 a bash (I used to
hate KDE for being fat and slow - not really a problem on modern hardware).
By god, it is a thing of sheer beauty now I've themed it and added a
couple of my favourite fonts.
Everything works with one exception and it's both 10x prettier than
any version of Windows, 2x prettier than even MacOSX (and being pretty
is what MacOSX is about) and a damn sight faster than both.
Even has pretty wobbling-jelly window animations like MacOSX (obviously
 Multi monitor support - works find except it has no
auto-detection-fu - so I have some menu items with my common layouts in,
scripted with xrandr and click those. I guess I could hook those scripts
I know it's late coming, but I think Linux really has matured nicely -
it's faster, more reliable (usually has been) and now truly prettier
than all the competition.
NB this is Mint - Ubuntu and DeadRat seem intent on following the MS
model of constant shaftage for no good reason (cough systemd, wayland etc)
If only MS could just polish their turd instead instead of reinventing
everything. TBF that is what MacOSX seems to do but as I'm not a Mac
user, I cannot be sure. I do noticed all my colleagues Macbooks run like
The one thing that MS have actually managed to avoid doing over the
years is reinventing stuff. They nail a different GUI on top but much of
the fundamentals are the same as they were in 95. There's a lot of bits
I wish they would tinker with (multiple mouse support so trackpads can
have a different speed to the rodent) but the ability to run many bits
of s/w from the 90s without really trying is worth something.
MacOS OTOH from my little experience, does seem to do things that screw
over users who aren't bang up to date.
Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?
I have certainly found that with my only ever iPhone. It works (3G model
IIRC) but it is rendered useless because nothing will install on the
no-longer updated iOS and the stupid Apple app store is too poorly
designed to offer out of date but compatible apps.
At least with Android, I could slap CyanogenMod on it when it's out of
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 05/06/2015 16:20, Jo-Anne wrote:
Because he is a dinosaur using nothing; He hasn't got any power in his
house to run a computer.
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFCC">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/06/2015 16:20, Jo-Anne wrote:<br>
6/4/2015 11:50 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
"With help from IBM, Microsoft has patched a critical Windows
vulnerability that flew under the radar for nearly two decades.
has existed in every version of Windows since Windows 95, and
allowed an attacker to run code remotely when the user visits a
<<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2846004/microsoft-fixes-severe-19-year ">http://www.pcworld.com/article/2846004/microsoft-fixes-severe-19-year </a>-
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://tinyurl.com/oprog6w ">http://tinyurl.com/oprog6w </a>
You'd think they would pay some attention to fixing ancient bugs
their crapware instead of foisting Windows 10 on us.
Um...the article cited is from November 2014, and it says the bug
was found in April 2014. Why is this an issue now?
<font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Because he is a dinosaur
using nothing; He hasn't got any power in his house to run a
Because for some reason he has a chip on his shoulder about MS.
It's especially ironic as he says "You'd think they would pay some
attention to fixing ancient bugs" when that's exactly what they did.
I like to think of the situation this way.
1) Average defectivity rate is one bug per thousand lines of code.
2) Average OS has 50 million lines of code.
3) Every OS has 50,000 bugs.
4) Easy bugs are found quickly, subtle bugs are not.
OSes are released, before we're significantly down that bug curve.
(I used to work in a group that released two OSes, that's
how I know the situation. I saw the actual bug curve.)
5) In bad companies, code is reused without review.
For example, all sorts of idiots reused JPG and TIFF libraries,
not knowing there was a mine-field inside them. We ended up
with some serious image-related exploits, years after the
libraries were in common usage. Witness the mess with SSL
as another example (just about every bad practice imaginable).
6) While there are some techniques for reducing defectivity,
they're not all that effective. They might reduce bugs by
a factor of three. There is an organization that tracks the
issue, and delivers "ratings" to companies. I've forgotten
In such a situation, I don't see much point in standing
on a soapbox and claiming superiority. There isn't any.
Merely a matter of how public some of the more serious
issues were handled.
As far as WinXP goes, if you go to Windows Update today,
there are no security patches for you. No new ones. But,
if you modify the OS, to indicate it is a Point Of Sale
system, you can get security patches. And bugs like this
one, may actually be patched for you.
On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 05:50:15 +0100, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
I stopped reading at this point:
"According to Freeman, the bug relies on a vulnerability in VBScript,
which was introduced in Internet Explorer 3.0. Even today, the bug is
impervious to Microsoft?s anti-exploitation tools (known as Enhanced
Mitigation Experience Toolkit) and the sandboxing features in
Internet Explorer 11. "
Sounds like people who use real browsers have no cause for concern.
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.