On 05/06/2025 16:47, Jeff Layman wrote: the top of your list?
The problem is, that there *is* no large scale storage. The chepaest - pumped hydro - costs at leasts the same again as a solar farm. Batteries at that level of storage simply don't exist at *any* price. The batteries are there not to store energy overnight, but to act in place of the energy stored in rotating generators when an overload happens.
The options - pumped storage, large DC links to Norway's hydro, batteries, gas backup plant - ALL of these cost money, that is never included in the LCOE of 'renewables' because the figures would simply be too shocking to justify subsidies for a moment linger
Rebewables *by themselves* cannot make a functional electricity supply for the country
Oh, its happening. Just not in the headlines.
My guess is that once Red Ed is packed off to history, we will start fracking gas and use north sea gas as a temporary stopgap while a frantic nuclear de-regulation happens and small modular reactors are banged in at the rate of about 4-5 a year.
The gas power stations will remain as emergency power backup, and the renewables will simply cease to be subsidised - although existing contracts will be honoured - and the big issue of the day is who is going to pay to decommission them and return the land to green field once the companies they belong to have ceased trading, and who and how the waste is going to be dealt with
I doubt there will be a single wind or solar farm still running past 2040.