damp report

Second hand so bear with me!

Daughters Edwardian terrace, North London, has always shown evidence of damp in the basement area. Used as a kitchen/dining/living area and with no extract system in place hardly a surprise.

Some recent building work included re-plastering the solid brick wall next to the garden exit.

The skim coat blew off within a few months of the builders leaving site.

A firm specialising in damp consultancy were brought in and I now have a copy of their report. They *measured* relative damp and moisture content and did thermal imaging.

In view of previous adverse comment on damp investigation I thought running their recommendations though here worthwhile:-)

Basically, fit an extractor. OK

Also strip off exterior render made non-porous by non breathable paint. Replace with breathable lime based render and lime wash for decor.

Any internal plastering should be undertaken using a lime based plaster only.

I am no plasterer but visually it looked as if the internal plaster skim was not *attached* to the base coat either by scratching or unibond and that, while condensation is undoubtedly present, this is not the cause of the blowing.

Thoughts?

Reply to
Tim Lamb
Loading thread data ...

In message , Phil L writes

London basement:-)

Steps down from the highway to a tiny yard with similar at the back. The walls are not in contact with soil although the garden dividing wall is suspect: poor pointing, porous brick coated in Ivy.

They spotted some poor chimney pointing which is clearly leading to moisture penetration to the room below.

I wonder how significant the exterior non-breathable paint is?

Reply to
Tim Lamb

Had there been a particularly bad road accident?

Bill

Reply to
Bill Wright

Sounds like they were one of the few damp firms that know what they are saying. Old London (in particular) houses are usually of no cavity construction (easily seen if you can see the exterior brickwork, it is often Flemish bond

formatting link

It is impossible for this type of wall to be completely watertight. They admit moisture and were designed assuming open fires (and lots of air changes as a result) and unsealed windows. This kept the moisture penetrating the walls under loose control. Seal the walls and windows, take away the air changes and you have a problem.

Using Lime mortar allows the wall to breath as intended, the extractor gets rid of the moist air. Use moisture permeable paint on top. Sensible solution to the problem.

Trying to keep the moisture out by lining the inner wall usually fails. The existing plaster would have delaminated because the moisture penetrating the wall had nowhere to go and built up behind the plaster skim coat until it broke free from the brickwork.

Reply to
Peter Parry

I try to be succinct:-)

Reply to
Tim Lamb

In message , Peter Parry writes

They do not offer to do repair work so more honest than most!

Right.

I'm not sure there is that level of damp. Wall feels cold certainly. Prior to the building work there was the same lack of ventilation and amount of cooking without the skim coat popping off.

Reply to
Tim Lamb

Round here plasterers are using some kind of polymer render bonded to a steel mesh.

Reply to
stuart noble

I was wondering about that, unless its built on the side of a very steep hill of course.

Brian

Reply to
Brian-Gaff

I can't believe that lime based is the only plaster/render that is able to breathe.

For relatively small repair jobs, 3 visits at 3 day? intervals to allow drying time will be prohibitively expensive in London:-(

Reply to
Tim Lamb

Going back many years, I remember work being carried out in a Victorian house with the same problem in the semi basement.

The builders fixed a corrugated bitumin liner internally to all the exterior walls which was plastboarded over. This does reduce the internal size of the room and requires new skirting etc. But did seem to work just fine - as the place belonged to a pal and I'd have heard if damp came back.

Of course there may well be more cost effective ways today.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

It transmits a good deal more water vapour than cement

Is that what's proposed?

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

The report recommends using a lime based plaster and for necessary pointing, lime based mortar. It is unclear what they propose for external render.

The times scales are culled from the *Lime Stuff Ltd* site.

Reply to
Tim Lamb

In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes

Hmm.. I suspect the job may wait until they *re-model* the kitchen layout when an extractor can be fitted.

I am gathering knowledge:-)

>
Reply to
Tim Lamb

a dehumidifier makes more sense in most cases

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

That really ought to be a temporary solution!

Reply to
Fredxxx

not for a damp cellar. It's no less or more permanent than a fan, just more energy efficient in winter.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

The idea of running a 150-200W dehumidifier 24/7 isn't a cheap option at circa £200 per year, less if just run in the winter of course.

Reply to
Fredxxx

more energy efficient in winter.

You'd have to be living in a swimming pool for it to run 24/7

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

More to the point, a good deal larger than a fan and, in effect, another appliance that needs plumbing in. Where's it going to be located?

Reply to
stuart noble

Floor standing would be a nuisance as the current cooking area forms a slot or *galley* leading to the patio access door.

I think a route for an extractor could be found through the tops of the existing wall cupboards but this solution does not appeal to the person trying to justify a new kitchen!

Reply to
Tim Lamb

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.