Water heater wire - conduit or romex?

I'm putting in a new cold water heater along with the wire to run it. I will be using 10 gauge solid with a ground wire, and stapling it to the joists in the crawl space under the house.

The old wires were single wires run through a flexible conduit. The big boxes I called said that romex 10/2 w/ground would be fine to run in the crawlspace, stapled to the joists.

One store recommended style UF, the other said just any old romex would do.

What say you: single conductors run inside a conduit, regular romex, or romex UF?

Jon

Reply to
Jon Danniken
Loading thread data ...

Why can't you use the wires that were there before? That's what I did.

Reply to
mm

As I understand it, UF if ultraviolet light resistant. Not an issue, in crawl space. Might also have separately shielded ground, also not a big issue. I'd reuse the existing wires, or run romex.

Reply to
Stormin Mormon

10/2 RX should be fine indoors in a dry location. Code does not permit it to be stapled to the underside of floor joists. It must be run through bored holes in the joists. Running on the side of joists is okay, but in either case the wire must be at least an 1 1/4" from the edge. You can run conduit on the underside of joists.

Why not just pull new wires through the existing flexible conduit? BTW stranded wires are easier to pull.

Reply to
John Grabowski

Some is, some isn't. The "U" has nothing to do with "ultraviolet".

UF stands for "underground feeder".

Reply to
Doug Miller

Why bother? What's wrong with using the existing wiring??

Reply to
Doug Miller

Ah, thanks John, sounds like the romex is out, and the conduit is in.

For the ground condcuctor, do I have to use 10 gauge, or could I use say a

14 gauge? And can I just use bare wire in the flexible metal conduit?

Aye, it seems that is all that is available around here in bulk, so stranded it is.

Jon

Reply to
Jon Danniken

John's advice is incorrect.

He's right that it's not permitted to staple romex to the underside of joists. But it's *not* true that "it must be run through bored holes in the joists." If you need to run romex across joists, it's perfectly acceptable to nail a board across the joists, and staple the romex to the board.

But what's wrong with re-using the existing wire?

Yes.

No.

Yes.

Reply to
Doug Miller

What is a cold water heater? Most of us use hot water heaters to make hot wate, either gas or electric..

Reply to
hrhofmann

You've been asked four times now by three people.

Are you just going to take and give nothing back?

Reply to
mm

On 11/14/2009 7:46 PM hr(bob) snipped-for-privacy@att.net spake thus:

No.

I give the OP 25 points for not using that god-damndest stupidest construct in the English language, "hot water heater".

A water heater doesn't heat hot water. A water heater HEATS COLD WATER.

Reply to
David Nebenzahl

*Thanks Doug. I forgot about running boards. That is an approved method to run small cables on the underside of joists.
Reply to
John Grabowski

What he wrote only means one thing:

"I'm putting in a new cold water heater along with the wire to run it"

Reply to
George

joists.

That doesn't say WHY not the original wires, which is what people asked.

Reply to
mm

joists.

Perhaps he is adding a water heater, or moving it, or even replacing a gas, propane, or oil fired heater???????

Reply to
clare

Well, it's not totally silly. It could just be vernacular for "heater for producing hot water", as opposed to a hot-air heater. AND, strictly speaking, since hot water is perty arbitrary, a hot water heater indeed heats hot water, making it, well, hotter.

And then, there are hot water heaters and goddammed-hot hot water heaters.

Ackshooly, "water heater" would suffice, eh?

Reply to
Existential Angst

Here is the equivalent of a few thousand words as to why:

formatting link
Jon

Reply to
Jon Danniken

Thanks again John, and Doug. Can I just use some 1"x2" strips, or should I get something a little more sustantial?

Jon

Reply to
Jon Danniken

I glad you appreciated that. :-)

Jon

Reply to
Jon Danniken

Jon Danniken wrote: ...

...

Thicker than the cable and make a raceway in which the cable runs to protect from mechanical damage. One could misinterpret the above as meaning to staple to the surface of the furring strips.

At least in older Code, an uninhabited space would allow the cable to be surface-mounted as likelihood of mechanical damage is low since there's no normal access. Never hurts to be better than minimum and newer revisions may have tightened the requirements.

All in all, what I'd run would depend on the conditions in the crawlspace--do you have any vermin problems, is it dry/damp, etc., etc., ...

The surest would be pull some conduit w/ W-rated wire, going down from there to UF cable (only difference is mechanical) to dry location in conduit to Romex...

But to be perfectly clear on a previous point, the ground conductor must be sized same as the conductors. (There are exceptions but they don't apply to this).

--

Reply to
dpb

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.