In alt.home.repair firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
Thanks for the advice! To clarify something that was asked a few times,
all of the numbers in the chart I gave were measured directly at the
breaker panel. I took the cover off the panel and put one meter lead on
the neutral/ground bus bar and the other meter lead on one of the two
screw terminals where the hot wires from the meter are connected.
If it is a loose neutral, it almost has to be on the power company's
side. My breaker panel is right on the other side of the wall from the
meter... the supply wires into the breaker panel enter through the rear
of the box and I presume they are coming out the rear of the meter can
as well. The neutral connection to the neutral/ground bus bar in the
panel appears to be tight.
I will call the utility in the morning and see what they have to say.
I'll post back with further developments.
IMHO: Sounds that you have imbalanced circuit design within the residence
also, along with the possible loose neutral. Most moderately high current
devices in the kitchens and utility areas of a residence have priority
circuits specified to them, and are connected to the service in a way that
they cause minimal un-balancing of the overall system.
You know, I thought something was up when the local lighting supply
house dropped off two cases of mercury-vapor bulbs over there a couple
of weeks ago. I went over to ask my neighbor about it, maybe even work
out a deal like a quarter ounce per volt, but he was bogarting it so I
called the cops.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 08:33:46 GMT email@example.com wrote:
That was the right way to take the measurements, and you've done the
right thing in calling the utility. Your problem could be in the meter
box or at the pole, but either way, they are the right ones to fix it.
Jim Adney firstname.lastname@example.org
Madison, WI 53711 USA
In alt.home.repair email@example.com wrote:
Short version: Utility claims they fixed something and the test results
are better (3.1 V difference as opposed to 9.4 V), but I'm still not
sure what exactly they fixed.
I called the utility on Monday afternoon about 2 PM, then hung around
the house, hoping to catch the lineman and hear what he found, if
anything. The utility did try to call at 7:03 PM per the Caller ID.
I was in another room and the machine picked up before I did; I stopped
the machine and picked up and got silence. By 9 PM I hadn't heard
anything, hadn't noticed the lights going out, and I hadn't retested,
so I decided to call again today (Tuesday).
I called today at about 2 PM and the call center rep said that they came
out yesterday and "repaired a connection at the weatherhead". To me,
the "weatherhead" is the thing at the top of the conduit running up from
my meter, where the wires make almost a 180 degree turn and go out
through a plastic disc with holes in it. I went out and looked at it
from the ground and couldn't see anything different. I can't see my
connections at the pole very well, so I'm not sure if anything changed
I decided to retest. I measured again at the breaker panel, with most
of the loads in the house shut off except as noted. The results were:
A/C uWave left right l-r notes
off off 120.4 118.7 1.7 run 1
off on 120.9 117.8 3.1
on off 118.7 118.2 0.5
on on 119.0 117.1 1.9
off off 121.2 119.7 1.5 run 2
off on 121.5 119.0 2.5
on off 119.5 119.5 0.0
on on 120.0 118.2 1.8
The 3.1 volt spread does seem to be an improvement from the previous
result, which was a 13.1 volt spread (-3.7 to +9.4).
I climbed up on the roof and inspected the connections at the top of the
meter conduit. I have an insulated crimp splice on each hot wire, and
a bare crimp splice on the neutral wire. I'm pretty sure that the hot
wire splices weren't changed, as each one has a small crack in the
insulation that has been there for a while, and I'm assuming the lineman
would have replaced the insulation sleeve if he installed a new
connector. I am not sure if the bare neutral splice was changed; even
though I haven't inspected it carefully in the past, it doesn't _look_
brand new - there are some black spots (oxidation?) on it, and the
engraved markings are easy to read because dirt seems to have
accumulated in the grooves. There weren't any telltale bits of wire
lying on the roof or shiny places on the wire next to the connector,
either. The thing that holds the mechanical tension on the bare netural
wire (basically a ramp on the wire and a mating ramp with a metal loop
around the conduit) hasn't been changed.
I'm also pretty sure that they didn't do anything to the meter. First,
my lights didn't go out. Also, even though I didn't write down the
serial number on the meter seal before I called, it's at least the same
type of seal, and the metal loop through the meter can tab isn't shiny
as I would expect with a new seal.
It's entirely possible that the bad connection was at the pole and I'm
mistaken about where the "weatherhead" is, or that the path from the
lineman to the call center four states away is lossy and noisy. I'm
curious to know what exactly was repaired, but the test results seem
to show an improvement, so maybe I should just be happy.
Thanks to all for the advice and assistance!
You don't look at the spread as much as the change in voltage when a single
phase load is turned on verses when it is off. If the AC is 240 V, it
really matters little if it is on or off.
The voltages look perfectly normal now.
Probably recrimped the neutral connector.
New seals need not be shiny. They sit in a bin in the toolbox of a truck
for months or years before installation. Also, he could open your
meterbase, tighten the connections, and close the meterbase without ever
interrupting your power, unless you have a 60amp meter base.
No your not mistaken on what the weather head is.
I once had a bastard open delta service (commercial service) that lost a
leg. It was dam near mid night before the line man showed.
He got out of the truck with an attitude and was going to teach me something
RIGHT NOW. He started spewing out the right way of testing the system as I
kept my temper and held my tongue.
He got the same readings as I had. Lost a phase. Then I turned on the 8 inch
spot light on the roof of my service van. The light went to the transformer
with one of the feeders hanging down cause the terminal on the transformer
was gone. Absolute silence from the line man. They had to replace the
Be happy that there is an improvement. Doubtful you will know the truth to
what they really did.
Never got so much as a oops from him.
Kudos. Not that the problem is fixed, but more important,
how you approached the problem. With intent and solutions to
get it solved the first time. Others should appreciate why
your attitude - how problem was addressed - was so
productive. Also important: a (potentially) major problem was
solved before it could happen.
You did exactly the right things.
For future reference: power codes require that the voltage varies no
more than approximately 3-5% from a nominal 240V at the panel under
worst-case conditions (ie: max power on one leg, zero on the other).
Another 3-5% are permitted at the end of the circuits.
[Precise values of permitted variance will change from jurisdiction
[Note all of the below is assuming you're measuring the voltages on
the main bus bars. If you're measuring at a circuit-end, double them.]
What that means, for example, is that the leg voltage at the panel
on a given leg should drop no more than 4-5 volts even when max power
on that leg, and zero load on the other. Given resistance in the
neutral, _half_ of that would be the neutral "going towards" the
maxed out leg, and half of that would be the maxed out leg "going
In otherwords, (100A panel right?), drawing 100A on one leg, zero
on the other, the fully loaded side could drop as much as 4-5 volts
(hot-neutral), leg-to-leg drop by as much as 2-3V, and unloaded side
to neutral voltage could _rise_ as much as 2-3V.
If the neutral-leg voltage varies more than half of the leg-to-leg
does (see (1) below), you have a loose neutral.
All that said, there are several caveats:
1) Extreme caution should be taken when taking the voltage levels
off your voltmeter. There are a number of ways they can misread,
and many voltmeters are simply not that accurate at measuring RMS
volts. So, don't take a few volts either way seriously.
2) While voltmeters can be fooled by back EMI (line noise), for
the most part it will be minor. To minimize these affects, use
resistive loads (rather than motor or electronic). Ie: heaters.
3) While it may seem that you were approximately "on" those
numbers, remember that your test loads were MUCH less than 100A,
so the problem you were seeing was much worse than the allowable
variance. Frankly, if your wiring was good, given the loads
you were able to test with, I'd expect the voltage variation to
be a volt at most, but, generally speaking, you can't rely
on your voltmeter to that high a degree of accuracy.
Most times the variation will be extremely obvious. You were
on the low side of "obvious" [+]
While your "fixed state" is _still_ outside of what I suggested
above, it's a considerable improvement over what it was, and I'd
be doubtful of taking it too seriously. That said, keep an
eye on it.
[+] The high side of obvious is having a lightbulb on one
leg expire with a BRIGHT flash when you try to turn on
something on the other leg - and that "something" doesn't work.
Chris Lewis, Una confibula non set est
It's not just anyone who gets a Starship Cruiser class named after them.
I'd recommend, you don't use a UPS, it's useless and a pain in the ass.One
friend of mine who runs a computer shop, told me that a customer had a
kaputt ups after a power outage.When the power came back, the UPS went
poof.All modern hard discs have an auto parking function in case of power
failure, I think, and one should save everything regularly, I think.
major in electrical engineering, freelance electrician
FH von Iraklion-Kreta, freiberuflicher Elektriker
dimtzort AT otenet DOT gr
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.