Its there but its hyped up, I bought a few bulbs but it was a waste
of money, color is poor and efficency no better than Cfls and price is
to high from the units ive tried. it will get better. Stated watt
equivilant on mine was over rated 4 x in my quick comparison. Now for
my bicycle or a flashlight they are the best.
I've made a study of this for aquarium lighting. If you go to the
manufacturer's websites (manufacturer's of the actual LEDs, not the
light fixtures) and do some calculations and add a few WAGs, it comes
out that high intensity LEDs are no more efficient that current
fluorescent light technology. So the folks claiming that they are
more efficient are full of hype.
For special color applications LEDs may have an advantage. Also, LEDs
may be more directional than fluorescent tubes, and so might get an
effective-light-delivered advantage in some cases and absent a good
reflector on a fluorescent bulb.
But in general, on a lumens delivered per watt input basis, the
available high intensity LEDs are not a more efficient light source
than modern types of fluorescent, such as T8 and T5 bulbs with
electronic ballasts. There may be some stuff in the laboratory which
is more efficient but it either hasn't hit the market yet, or is
selling at a huge premium--think $400 per the equivalent light output
of a 40 watt fluorescent tube.
LEDs may last longer than fluorescents, but they are hugely more
expensive to buy. The datasheets from the LED manufacturer's
typically list a 50,000 hour from beginning to 70% of original output,
lifetime. But none of them provide a lifetime curve. So we don't
know if that means that LEDs have a linear decline from 100% to 70%
output over 50,000 hours, or whether the output declines steeply early
on and then declines shallowly (bad), or whether it keeps its output
near 100% for most of that time and declines steeply towards the end
of 50,000 hours. Which is it? No publicly available information.
For comparison, General Electric lists a 30,000 lifetime for its T5
fluorescent bulbs until output declines to 80% of original. And they
provide lifetime output curves to show you how the decline in output
White LEDs are actually ultraviolet LEDs with a phosphor coating which
converts the ultraviolet energy into white visible light. So, most
likely, they will decline in output in a fashion very similar to
fluorescent light bulbs, because they are both using the same method
of converting ultraviolet radiation into visible light.
LEDs run on low voltages of about 3 to 5 volts. If several LEDs are
connected in series, the voltage may be higher, but this is not a very
efficient way to run more than about 3 LEDs at a time. So LEDs
require a power supply to convert house current to low voltage high
amperage DC current. The power supplies can (and should, if they're
good) be quite expensive.
I hope that helps,
A few lumen depreciation curves for white LEDs have turned up. They
tend to be close to level for the first thousand or two hours, then
gradually acceletrate downward, and after that the curve gradually shifts
to an exponential decay curve. The decay stops accelerating and
begins decellerating at maybe 90 or 85% of initial light output. Some
curves I have seen are for only enough time for the decline to still be
Close - the LED chip produces blue light. The phosphor lets through
some of the blue light, and converts the remainder to a "broadband yellow"
whose spectrum stretches from mid-green to mid-red. The combination is
There are a few high color rendering index white LEDs with a blend of
phosphors to avoid a surplus of yellow and shortage of red and green.
Even most of these use blue-emitting rather than UV-emitting LED chips.
- Don Klipstein ( email@example.com)
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.