lots of troubles can be proven, take bad sewer, find plumber had
snaked for old owner bam they are on hook, roof leaks, contractor gave
estimate 2 years ago, bam old owner on hook. helping a old girl friend
who was buying home i called roofer i knew to inspect. he arrived and
said need new roof, and chimney needs rebuilt. i said you havent been
up there. he said i have been up there 4 times in last 5 years, fixing
leaks, why bother climbing up again, roof needs replaced.
OK, you lucked on the same roofer as the old owner had...
But, how do you know otherwise which tradespeople the old owner used? Once in
awhile, there's a service sticker or something, but that may not mean anything.
And *they're* not exactly itching to get involved in a lawsuit either.
The lawyer can subpoena repair records from the previous owner. Perhaps
credit card charges or similar stuff looking for plumbing bills related to
the water problem. A private investigator can be hired. if the previous
owner is caught lying, and compounding it by lying in court, hes gonna pay
a nice toll.
Still not easy, but it is doable.
What plumbing bills would related to a basement moisture intrusion problem ???
Yep. And, I hardly think repair records are like a pilot's flight logs -
they're of course not required of a homeowner; there is a good chance nothing
like that exists. Even if there are, think of all the DIY, cash transactions,
stuff simply left unrepaired. You can spend a pretty penney for not much, very
quickly and very likely.
Not that we shouldn't disclose (I certainly plan to - but I have or will correct
the problems I know of), or that in some cases an undisclosed problem should be
pursued with the previous owner.
But this idea that pops up here in alt.home.repair from time to time that
there's always recourse and disclosure laws "protect" one is folly. It really
doesn't work that way all that often, and several things need to go in one's
favor to be able to prove an intentional non-discosure. The best course is to
carefully look over any house considered to be bought, and be prepared
(including financially) to make repairs as time goes on.
if your main concern is pump failure then install TWO sumps both
interconnected by the underground french drain each sump with its own
drain line going outdoors and perhaps each with a battery or if your
on city water a water backup pump.
True it will add some costs but not a whole lot.
Or just add a extra sump pit at a convenient place to exit a pump.
then wait awhile if you see a lot of water volume then have the
contractor or plumber add a second pump.
you may find water volume isnt much, and then you can relax, but know
a extra pump can easily be added any time you want
Thanks for taking the time write all this out.
My property is basically flat, so no area is below the basement
level. A pump is needed. We already purchased a special-order
battery backup pump, which the basement company suggested we do.
(They offered the option to buy it on our own to save some money.) We
ordered a Zoeller 510, which is the same brand of pump the basement
company uses as the main sump.
I had one contractor who was adamantly against weep holes. It's so
Basement drainage systems are not about removing water, they are about
removing water pressure. If you do not have water pressure pushing on
your walls, then the piping system should not move that much water. If
you do have pressure, then ignorning it so long as you cant see the water
coming in is akin to burying your head in the sand. The problem still
Putting in a sump without drains is a waste of money IMHO. If your gonna
do a thing, do it right. If you dont add the piping, it wont fix your
problem. You need something to catch a flash flood of sorts. If there
are no pipes, then it will take a long time for water to weep across the
basement to the sump pit. during that time there will be pressure and
water will be coming in as it is now.
Personally what I would do is put in the sump if you wish, and run just 1
weeping tile from under/around the location where the water is entering
now, to the sump pit. Then if/when you find new locations that leak, add
new weeping tile. I dont think it should cost any more to add these pipes
one at a time so long as you consider expansion when you add the first.
Unless your basement is finished.
But apparently in her case, there has been only 1 water problem in 20
years and it was coming in at one specific spot. In this case,
putting a sump pit in that one area could very well work, as the water
doesn't have to come from all areas of the basement., it will be right
near the one trouble spot.
On May 30, 12:27�pm, email@example.com wrote:
well every 4 years they get other water in. apparently in a different
spot in the basement.
no one has to do anything. maybe being 50 and spending a lifetime of
patches today I prefer to do it right, do it once, then forget about
it and relax. often its less work hassle and cost.
The contractor who recommended against the weep holes that floors me.
they only do anything if water has infiltrated the wall, and you
REALLY DONT want water trapped in the wall.
What you should really understand is the issue with water. I suppose you
could say there are 2. Discomfort, and damage.
Sump systems are designed to prevent damage. They remove water pressur on
your basement walls, thus avoiding the wall and floor cracks that
eventually come from that pressure.
If you dont think you have a pressure problem, and you just want to stop
water intrusion, then why not find where it is coming in, and patch the
hole. You will be increasing the water pressure on your walls, but if you
insist its not a problem and a rare occurance, then so be it.
I hate to find out later though that you cracked a wall/floor rather than
put in a proper relief system.
its impossible to completely seal walls and floors that absorb and
have cracks and openings from water getting in.
take the typical dry lock paint used on a block wall with water inside
eventually the paint will bubble or the wall crack and mold will
likely grow on the wall,
your much better off keeping the walls dry and redirecting the water
away from your home
Yes, that's what they are. And they are a necessary part of the interior French
B-Dry (the system I have) puts a thick vinyl cover over the bottom 8 inches or
so of the interior wall to cover the weep holes.
On your problem, I think you can probably two-stage it - first, the sump where
you have an issue. Then, if you still have an issue - the interior drain system
tying into the sump.
Then, as long as you power the pump, you're in good shape.
Its a once in a lifetime flood. Who cares! Ignore it, get over it, and
get on with life. People are living in temporary housing because there
house washed away or has 10' of water in the living room because of
that storm. If I were you, I would sit back and relax, and prepare the
the next storm in 20 years.
Thank you, but I do not need to be reminded how others fared worse
than myself and I should just "get over it." I live in a town that
floods regularly and we have mulitple FEMA offices because of it. I
am fortunate to not live in the flood plain by the rivers. Many have
chosen to have their homes reclaimed by the government, after this
Last month I gave a deposit to the waterproofing contractor and since
then have gotten a wide range of opinions and suggestions. Before I
spend thousands of dollars I'd like to understand the situation better
so I don't open a Pandora's box of other problems.
Thanks again to the people who've taken the time to be helpful.
I have NEVER heard of what your considering making the situation
one friend had to have the contractor return and add a run under
center of floor, even after all that work a underground stream
surfaced there. the contractor did it for free.
later he found that before his home was built a stream ran thru his
lot, and had been filled in. no wonder he had troubles.
the extra underground run dried things up permanetely. 5 years later
he sold the home the dry basement warranty.
Vickie, sometimes the best advice of all is the easiest, to just
ignore it. See, won't take long. I was not saying you should ignore it
because I didn't want to give an alternative longer solution, I
genuinely believed (and still do) that you could indeed ignore it and
not spend a penny. Is that not the best solution financially?
Best of luck whatever you decide.
nothing is certinally a option. but looking at things the long way.
the biggest investment most of us own is our home so its generally a
good idea to take care of it.
now waiting awhile after the big flood may get you lower prices,
because right now crews are likely very busy.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.