# 90 amps for electric car charge!

What concerns me most is maintainability. The NYT article states that the battery costs \$12000. That is a big chunk of change down the road a few miles. I've never owned anything with a rechargeable battery, where the first few months weren't the best of the experience, with a death spiral from there. So what becomes of the electric car with a dead battery? What is your trade in or resale value of a car with the electric equivalent of a blown engine.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
On 2/15/2010 8:01 AM, Bill wrote:

Supply and demand. As more electricity is needed to power cars the cost per KW hour will increase proportionately. If you don't own an electric car you'll be paying for your neighbors every time you turn on a switch. If they can't get it out of one pocket they'll get it out of another.
LdB
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

It's a 90A Circuit Breaker. However, the maximum current for the vehicle is 70A, as set by the duty cycle of the Pilot waveform. At 240v that is 16.8 kw*4 to do a full charge, or 67.2 kw total. At the national average of \$.12 per kw that is about \$8 (\$.04/mile) for a full charge to drive those 200 or so miles. This is about 1/3 the cost to drive an average gas vehicle at 20 MPG and \$2.60 per gallon.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

And again, this is an example of comparing apples to oranges. These electric vehicles are relatively small cars. And they should be compared to similar size fuel efficient cars, not the average gas vehicle. There are lots of car choices getting 30 city, 45 highway or better. The Toyota Prius gets 51 city 48 highway giving a fuel cost of about \$12. Here in the northeast with electric at 17c kwh, and using your above math, the fuel cost on the Prius vs the electric is a wash here.
But I bet the Prius is a far more drivable vehicle, capable of higher sustained highway speeds, etc. and doesn't have the obvious drawbacks for the user that the electric car has.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote:

Interesting choice for comparison since the Prius is a hybrid (partly electric) car. It is likely to include an option to charge the (relatively small) battery off the grid in the not-too-distant future.
From what little I have seen, the Tesla is a sports car - high acceleration, probably better high speed behavior.
--
bud--

<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

This talk about loads gets one thinking. Since 99% of homes and 100% of new ones here are electrically heated. And as it happens our island wide electrical sytem for a population of some half million persons is not connected to the North American grid. Any new domestic installations for last 30/40 years or more have required 200 amp services. Distribution transformer loadings (with anywhere from 3 to say 8 homes per transformer in suburban areas) must be installed on some sort of diversity. My heating won't be on simultaneously with all my neighbours, eh? I won't be cooking dinner, or taking a shower at exactly the same time etc. And in fact I will never be using all that 200 amps anyway? But if I were to plug in my 90 amp car recharger ...................... ! Hmmm!
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Well I'm getting out my popcorn to sit back and watch the show in California with this. They [California] had a fit with everyone buying those new TV's which use a bit more energy. (Overloading the electric grid.) In California no one wants any new major electric transmission lines built in their backyard.
If quite a few people buy these cars in California, it will be interesting to see what they do when it places a strain on their electric grid. Neighborhood nukes?
Or for that matter if there was a concentration of these new cars in one neighborhood anywhere. Say 3 homes all on the same electric company transformer. Then all 3 homes get electric vehicles, and they all recharge them at 6:00 pm when they get home on a hot summer day, and also have their AC and everything else going full blast???
Neighborhood Nuclear Power... http://www.hyperionpowergeneration.com/about.html
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
On 2/15/2010 4:08 PM, Bill wrote:

Aren't you assuming worst case? I think a lot of diversity will be involved. Many would likely just use a longer term lower current draw charge.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
George wrote:

And a lot more people would be going to off peak rates so they don't start to recharge until people are going to bed.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

OK if you have off-peak rates; which make great sense by the way. By spreading the load. Some places in the UK for example they have (or had) heat storage heaters that used electrcity at night at a cheaper rate. The cheap rate switched off early in the morning as people got up, made breakfast, used electric trains and street cars to get to work, factories started up etc.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Bill wrote:

I remember the Toshiba Corporation small reactor project for Alaska. I wonder how it's going?
TDD
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Bill wrote:

The last one is a good example of the law of unintended results.
TDD
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

You have a choice. In his hypothetical case of several homes sharing a transformer, you can either design for worst case or ignore it. The latter could very well result in the transformer overloading and the homes being without power. And his point is a very valid one. The existing transformer loads were calculated based on some assumptions of what loads would be in the future and a worst case scenario had to be calculated. I would not be surprised that suddenly having homes where new 70A loads for 4 hours appear could exceed the system design, with his transformer loading being a good example.
As for using a longer term lower current, there are two big problems with that:
1 - The longer it takes to recharge the car, the less attractive these cars become and they become totally excluded from many applications. That's especially true when you compare their operating costs with similar size ICE cars available today, eg hybrids, that have no charging issues.
2 - In today's instant gratification world, I doubt many people are going to want to charge it at less than the maximum. You need to run a new circuit to charge them anyway, so why would you not make it capable of charging at the max? And once you have that 90A circuit, you know people are going to use it. You could discourage this by offpeak pricing. But that gets back to what I said a long time ago, which is that you need to talk about a COMPLETE solution, from energy generation to the point of usage, not just an electric car. Yet, the miracle, clean, green electric car is all the media cares to talk about.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote:

As with any other big addition of power using equipment, you let the power Cc. know what you are doing (By getting a permit?) The transformer problem is then their responsibility. At least that was what I was told when I added a hot tub years ago.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

You're the first residential user that I ever heard of that notified the power company because they were installing a hot tub. In the rest of the residential world, no one is keeping track of what loads get added. You put in a 200amp service and that's the end of the story. If you need more capacity, THEN you call the electric company and upgrade to 300amps.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

It puts me in awe of the power of gasoline when you consider that the equivalent POWER flow through an ordinary filling station hose at the gas station when you fill up your car is measured in MEGAWATTS!!!
Mark
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

Right now it's not an even comparison. But I think you'll all agree we're closer to the end of reasonably priced gas than we are from the beginning. No matter how much you think is left it's definitely a finite resource. On the other hand there are all sorts of potential new sources of electricity. Many that are of limited practicality right now have potential to become more practical either because of technology improvements or just volume increase. Most are "green" and do not add to the carbon dioxide load. Like it or not the days of gasoline powered transportation are numbered.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
jamesgangnc wrote:

The SUN is a finite resource!
Just yesterday:
"HOUSTON - ExxonMobil Corp. added two billion barrels of oil equivalent to its proved oil and gas reserves in 2009, or 133 per cent of its production for that year, the largest U.S. oil company said Tuesday..."
That is, Exxon FOUND a third more oil than they recovered.

I agree. If you had asked the average New Yorker in 1910 what would transportation be like in a hundred years, with a population increase of five-fold, he'd have probably wondered a) Where would we get enough horses, and b) What would we do with all the horse shit.
I'm personally rooting for teleportation.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net wrote:

So no one you know gets an electrical permit when adding a major circuit?
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
wrote:

No.
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>

## Site Timeline

• ### Kitchen faucet chatter

• - next thread in Home Repair
• ### Need a Generator for a Sump Pump which type to get?

• - previous thread in Home Repair
• ### Looking for Higher Wattage LED bulbs

• - newest thread in Home Repair
• ### Wing mirrors on cars

• - last updated thread in Home Repair
• ### How To Chamfer Cabinet Door Frame?

• - the site's newest thread. Posted in Woodworking Forum
• Share To

HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.