That's simply poor design. Claiming that microbore is superior because an idiot can't install it inappropiately is a strange way to justify it....mind you..in your case...
That's simply poor design. Claiming that microbore is superior because an idiot can't install it inappropiately is a strange way to justify it....mind you..in your case...
Well, we surmised it might be scale, because: no evidence of sludging, and only affected a couple of rads, then predominantly one rad, and eventually shutting off ALL rads bar that one seemed to shift whatever it was.
It's suspected that a bit of scale broke off from within the boiler (it was rather prone to kettling for a while) which is what then lodged somewhere in the system. Can easily see how a flake of scale would end up attempting to fit down a microbore pipe having come out the boiler on rather thicker piping, and plug it enough to prevent flow to a rad or two, depending on where it ended up.
There were no indications of anything else going on, no leaking overflows, no hot feed tanks, rads were (when they actually all heated up) hot at top and bottom, no sign of sludge coming out when system drained and flushed, etc.
I still can't see a lump of scale managing to block the bigger bore pipework (that's effectively about what goes in/out of the boiler) like it could block microbore.
Velvet
Something you get in Ann Summers shop's
You haven't a clue what you are on about.
:-) How long does that generally take to start showing up?
Velvet
That level of scale/sludge would block up a small bore or microbore system. As Andy has pointed out, micro has nothing whatsoever to do with the blockage, and condemning a system fitted by the millions, because of one poorly designed/installation/maintenance is quite foolish.
That's why IMM has a microbore sewage system. In pipe diameter, size doesn't matter, and he is in a permanent state of verbal diarrhoea, he flushes out his sludge frequently.
Gawd. Anyone who can't see that a small bore system isn't more prone to blockage needs his arteries examining..
depending on use, water, maintenance, etc, anything from 10-28 years.
Its useless to argue with IMM. Unless you are prepared to print a glossy brochure and send it to him with a manufacturers name on it, he won't believe anything you say no matter how reasonable.
Ah, like the one you used to justify using microbore to replace a poorly designed small bore system.
Humpty Dumpty your middle name perchance?
You haven't a clue what you are on about.
What glossy brochure promote microbore?
You haven't a clue what you are on about.
Have you been on the ale?
You haven't a clue what you are on about.
What a relief. Instred of IMM's veiled allusions a complete rational description.
To which my comment is 'true, but probably irrelevant'
UF heating is done this way anyway mostly - well mine is, and yes, it is amenable to all that stuff, but it gets a bit irritating to implement.
The one thing I did enjoy tho, was being able to balance all the zones
*at the manifold* using the tiddly little flow meters on each branch.
Why do you recommend it then?
Christian.
Alas you used Polyplumb, not recommended by Gledhill. The only plastic pipe maker I know that holds this distinction by any other maker.
, and condemning a system fitted by the millions, because of one
So of copurse condemiong all small bores systems because of one poorly designed/installation/maintenance (example) is of course completely correct.
Like hot air flowing downstairs?
You don't know what you are talikng about do you?
How would I know? I don't read glossy brochures much.
Yah, well no, fine.
Date: 12 August 2003 Subject: Re: Electric underfloor heating
(IMM writes) Christian,
Go to the Polyplumb web site.
NO, it is foolish.
You don't know what you are talikng about do you?
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.