I have a more-or-less philosophical question for the group (or for those in circumstances similar to mine).
The house we've lived in for 25 years is in need of some significant repair: replacement of the septic to make it compliant with today's standards; a chronically leaky basement that has successfully resisted all attempts at a fix; outdated kitchen cabinetry; new siding & windows; landscaping (including new sidewalks); bathroom renovation, and new floor covering throughout.
With the exception of the leaky basement, the house is certainly decent and livable, but too small for what we foresee as an expanding family of spouses and grandkids that might want to come visit on holidays. So, my wife and I are inclined to sell the only house we've ever owned and move into something larger and more accommodating (and more low-maintenance for our old age).
The question is: in order to make the house more appealing and saleable to potential buyers, where do you draw the line on investing time, energy and $$?
Does it make more sense to list the house AS IS, pricing it accordingly to allow for the repairs and upgrades needed, or to invest one's resources into fixing it up BEFORE putting it on the market, in the hopes of a speedier sale and a higher price tag?
Or, is it worth simply doing the less expensive cosmetic improvements so you can attract more buyers?
I'd be really interested in hearing opinions, particularly from those that have been through it.
Thanks in advance.