Having been painted does not prevent lead paint that is now covered from being a problem. It would appear you have not totally removed any possible layer
Having been painted does not prevent lead paint that is now covered from being a problem. It would appear you have not totally removed any possible layer
Removal is not required for lead paint. It only needs to be covered with non-lead paint. That is the standard everywhere that I know of.
I certainly don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to spell.
There is no requirement for removal of all lead paint, not even in abatement projects. You need to contain it. However, if you did it yourself, it would be difficult to prove and therefore it would be as if there was still lead there. Unless you have it tested, you presume it is there. Since the OP did the work himself, he did not use lead- safe work practices, he didn't use interim controls, and he didn't clearance; so it is as if the lead is still there. In fact, the lead might still be there because you don't know what quality of work was done. For example, did he clear the soil outside the house as the end of painting?
Working with lead isn't bad and isn't hard, but you do need training and need to do it right.
Even removing the lead paint doesn't matter. It is pre-78. If it hasn't been tested, then you presume it's lead. The homeowner's word doesn't mean anything. Besides, there lead in things other than paint.
It's not always that simple. The process and sequence from offer to contract varies regionally.
In MA, it typically works as follows:
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.