Could be true but you would have to ignore the massive effects of cargo
ships of Obama money headed for ACORN and getting 200% of the people
voting for Obama and his socialist horde. Right now, Obama could
probably get away with not knowing how many states are in the US, or
even going to foreign soil and apologizing for being a US citizen,
assuming he is one, of course.
As it stands, the socialists are in control of voter fraud, the media
and the government. Won't be too long before rich Canucks will have to
slip into Russia for decent medical care, and seems little the once free
individual can do about it.
Using FREE News Server: http://Motzarella.org
And in what way is that different than Bush money being shoveled by
the coffin-full to KBR/Halliburton and other fat-cat oil companies in
order to get campaign contributions so they can skew the vote?
ACORN is nothing compared to what happened in Florida in 2000. There
the vote was skewed by denying people to vote, not messing with the
BTW, Jack, this is all you're getting from me on this. Have a nice day.
* KBR and Halliburton are not oil companies.
* Oil companies - or any corporation for that matter - may not make campaign
* Bush won Florida in 2000 by some 500-odd votes; Acorn is responsible for
many tens of thousands.
* Vote denial in Florida was never litigated. The controversy was over the
counting of the votes.
Your objections fit the narrative but not the facts.
The controversy was over the fact that many thousands were denied the
right to vote because of convenient purging of the voter lists which
cost the Dems WAY more than those 500 votes. IOW, fraud.
The concept being discussed is fraudulent votes, which ACORN is
accused of orchestrating (maybe accurately accused of doing)
The fact it was never litigated doesn't mean it didn't happen, just
like the fact that Bush hasn't been convicted of war crimes doesn't
exonerate him of being a war criminal.
Ahhh yes, facts, a Repuglican specialty. (When it suits them..you
know, the situational kind.. like their ethics and morals.)
There was purging of the voter rolls in Florida and as many as 100,000 names
were removed from the voter registration lists. The main reason for the
removal was a prior felony conviction (felons could not vote in Florida in
2000). Of course this cut down on the Democratic vote tremendously.
As I recall, a commission was convened to examine this issue (among others).
The commission could not verify that a single eligible voter had been denied
an opportunity to vote, though they did find one woman who had been purged
from the rolls but was able to vote in her new precinct (she had registered
That's the way the adversarial system works: you promote your side, I'll
promote mine, your put forth your facts, I'll show my truths, and we'll let
fair-minded folks make a judgement.
I guess that was the same as Clinton money being shoveled by the coffin
full and awarding no-bid contracts to Halliburton to continue its work
in the Balkans, but has little to do with ACORN being publicly funded by
left wingers and purposely stuffing the ballot box to elect nothing but
Thats pretty funny. The democrats stuff the ballot box with phony
ballots, greedily trying punch out 10 ballots at a time, and leave
hanging chads on the last few, so they are not counted. Of course, since
only the democrats are cheating like this, it's only democrats that have
hanging chads... Then, they bitch the hanging chad, fake ballots were
not counted... Only a socialist democrat has balls large enough to try
that. They fixed the problem though, no more hanging chads, we vote
electronically. Good thing we don't do the purple thumb thing, or
democrats would be sporting 10 purple thumbs.
BTW Robocop, I thought you said you plonked me? I guess you were just
talking out your ass, as usual? I could care less what kind of day you
You're probably referring to Obama claiming there were 57 states. In his
defense, there WERE 57 venues that got to vote in the Democratic Convention.
* The 50 states, of course,
* The District of Columbia,
* Puerto Rico,
* The U.S. Virgin Islands,
* The Dutchy of Grand Fenwick,
* Patagonia. and
Chicago residents got to vote twice, and U.S. citizens abroad (unless they
were in the military) voted with their home states.
Yeah, no other president has ever claimed there were 57 states, not
counting Alaska and Hawaii.
Counting on all my fingers and toes, and listening to his words, doing
some high level math... 57 plus 2.... 57 plus 2.... hmmmm.... BINGO 59.
I stand corrected, he actually, if I got the math right, claimed 59
states. Letterman can't seem to find any humor in that, so maybe there
really are 59 states... who really knows...
No, that would be 57 states, not counting Alaska and Hawaii. See above
for the math... 59
Plus 7 states that are not states, that would be....59 plus 7
non-states.... 66 states would be what he thinks, based on his words,
and adding your words...
There were a number of voting districts that had more people vote than
were registered to vote. This could be a problem if the mass media ever
figures out something is wrong here. I suspect, the democrats will need
to be more careful when stuffing ballots. 120% of the voters voting is
not particularly smart. ACORN will need to get more than 76
registrations from each democrat voter or things could get messy.
Have they put up the video of him now saying that he really thinks some
people shouldn't own homes, that was a Republican idea -- he supported
affordable quality rental housing all along?
If nothing else, you've got to give the little hypocrite credit for
audacity. Of course, with the main stream media being so far in the tank
for these guys, he's pretty much able to tell whatever lies he
wishes, "journalists" aren't going to bother to do any fact-checking
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough
I saw several of Obama's ACORN people on TV the other day stating they
registered to vote multiple times. One, 76 times, one, 32 times and
one, too many times to count. The one that said she registered too many
times to count said she didn't mind, she was doing it for the good of
ACORN, which has been charged with voter fraud in something like 18
different states has also been earmarked for $53 million, or billion
(hard to keep track these days) in Obama money.
I think Obama and his fellow socialists can already do about anything
they want due to the left wing media propaganda machine as well as the
ability to get more people voting than exist, without raising nary an
eye brow in the mainstream media.
Using FREE News Server: http://Motzarella.org
What station and program, please? I suppose the moderator/producer of the
program was not supportive of ACORN.
I am against voter fraud, but I am in favor of getting people out of
complaining mode and into constructive participation mode. Far less
important as to whether they are left or right. Heck, some of my best
friends are so far right, I look like a commie to them. I am just in favor
of justice, a chance for everyone willing to work, and for responsible
financing of the needs of of everyone according to their contributions to
society. Capitalism is fine with me if it is responsble, and not just
stealing in the Madoff sense. Socialism is fine with me too, as long as it
is NOT mooching and handouts. Please contribute to society ...
Socialism is nice in theory. But in practice, it fails.
Once you remove the incentive (winning and getting rich) from the
equation, the people who invent and produce everything, stop doing so.
BTW, we already have the mooching and handouts in this capitalist society.
"Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life"
Throughout the election cycle there were numerous reports (substantiated)
of this behavior. A quick Ask.com search should turn up numerous hits.
Madoff did not represent capitalism but rather fraud. Wouldn't matter
what system he was a part of, his type of personality would look for a way
to prosper at others' expense. In some systems, he would be at the top of
the political ladder, in others, a leech on society.
Socialism will always devolve to that point. As Margret Thatcher
said, "the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other
peoples' money". It is a system that is not long term sustainable. One can
go back to Plymouth Colony and the Mayflower compact. The Pilgrims nearly
starved when they tried a socialist society; it was only after people were
allowed to keep the fruits of their labors that the colony prospered.
Eventually those who are productive and aggressive realize that their labor
is not making any difference to them and benefiting those not as ambitious
and they slack off as well. If there is no reward, there's no reason for
taking risk or being overly ambitious. That's why communist and socialist
states either start or eventually become totalitarian with the state
instituting itself as the state religion. The religion of communism was to
get people to abandon human nature and sacrifice themselves and their labor
for the good of the state.
The thing is, a free market, with government ensuring that the frauds and
cheats are kept at bay, is one of the most effective and efficient ways for
people to contribute to society.
If you're going to be dumb, you better be tough
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.