You're very amusing. Go see how many OT threads I've ever started
in well over a decade here. Youe inability to defend your views
doesn't mean mine or wrong or that I'm being argumentative. When
you and the rest of the Usual Suspects stop using the Wreck to flog
your defense of statism, stealing from your fellow citizens,
and all the rest of it, I'll have no need to respond. In the mean
time you can continue to expect sharp counterpoint to your evil
ideas - the threads you and yours love to start...
Tim Daneliuk email@example.com
1. Fox is the network for the rest of us.
2. Fox, in general, has 12 of the top 13 cable network shows, with O'Reilly
at the top of the list.
For May, in general
1. TNT 3.5 million viewers (NBA playoffs contributed)
2. USA 2.8 million
3. ESPN 2.1 million
4. FOX 2.0 million
5. Nick 1.6 million
23. CNN 767,000
24. MSNBC 756,000
(CNBC didn't even make the list)
Okay.. that's FOX. What is Billo The Clown's share? You said, and I
quote: "O'Reilly's audience is greater than CNN, MSNBC, and CNBC.
That would be inaccurate.
How does Billo stack up against Olberman? Never mind the Network
Question # 1. Who is this numbers guy?
Question # 2 Where is Olberman on that list?
If you're going to point to a list, make it one that is relevant...
like this one:
Who cares? They aren't his numbers. He's reporting other's. This
information is *easy* to find. DYADGS.
Why don't you read?
1. Huffington, from a *YEAR* ago (really, you can't do better than
that to show your bias.
2. One week, touted as the *ONLY* time it's happened.
3. Do some research. You've totally lost it (if indeed you ever had
YOU have the facts clearly against you, yet stick with your bias.
Yes, you are biased into blindness.
Want to change the subject again? You clearly lost the argument,
though in your own clouded mind you've somehow "won". Before you
speak such nonsense again, perhaps you should spend a minute or two
Yes, you have lost it. You're so blind with hate you can't see how
silly your argument is.
Clearly you are. You have no interest in the *facts*.
I am an idiot indeed for engaging in any kind of discussion with an
asshole who throws the word 'hate' around like that.
You disgust me, but I don't hate you, Fuckface. You're not important
enough for me to hate you.
You are more like that wee bit of dog-shit on my shoe... annoying, but
not enough to hate....it wipes off easy..see?
I said nothing about hating me, though your words speak quite loudly.
Your hate is more than apparent in this group.
Why do I care that you have to announce that you're running away,
after clearly shown to be a fool. You cold have simply run away, or
you *could* have spent a minute with Google before showing your
Tim's point, early on in this thread, has SO proven to be true. This
discussion reminds me of Ann Coulter's book, How to Talk to a Liberal
(If you Must). Coulter points out how the typical liberal will, even
when the facts are in front of him, proving him wrong, continue to
argue, ignoring the evidence, and resort to profanity and name-calling.
Tim called it well and Robatoy proved it.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.