At my job, we're behind schedule right now and are working 6 9's to
get the building under roof by New Year's Day. BTW, steel stud
framing outside in the weather lately has been a real treat. Anyway,
on to my question:
Does the rate at which one is taxed vary with time and a half or
double time, or does it change with gross pay or does it not change at
all? I realize that the W4 exemptions establish the basic rate, but
do you pay more (percentage-wise) with overtime? I heard a story from
a welder who was making $12/hr said that for 6 months he was working
mandatory 50-hour weeks, then went to mandatory 60-hour weeks; his
paycheck difference was only about $30. Intuition tells me that this
is crazy and I've never paid that much attention to the actual amount
withheld when I've worked over 50 hours (other than to cuss the
federal and state governments).
Myself, I'd just as soon see income (and property and fuel etc.) tax
go away entirely, but since I'm stuck with it I would at least like to
know how far they're gonna ram it in before they break it off.
If anybody has some insight, I'd appreciate it.
Changes with gross pay. The more you make, the higher the rate at which you
are taxed. Overtime has nothing to do with it: suppose your base rate is
$20/hour. If you work 60 hours, 40 at straight time and 20 at time and a half,
you make (40 hr x $20) + (20 hr x $30) = $1400. You get taxed the same as if
you had worked 40 hours at $35/hour.
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)
How come we choose from just two people to run for president and 50 for Miss
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:47:39 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
...and it's called "progressive income tax rates". If your gross pay in
any pay period is extended to a yearly income, and that income bumps you
into a higher marginal tax bracket than the one based on your normal
number of hours, the federal tax is gonna be at a higher rate. But don't
worry, that makes you rich and you don't need that extra money.
What Doug said. But, let me add, that once you fill out your 1040,
you should get a slight refund, since, of course, your annual gross
pay isn't (e.g.) $35/hour. You Are making more money (and it May push
you into a higher bracket), but you aren't grossing an Annual salary
like the OT seems to make it (IOW, you aren' making
52(wks) * 40 (hrs) * (e.g.) $35 (plus the OT hours).
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:47:39 GMT, email@example.com (Doug Miller)
He is full of it! You will get taxed at a higher rate with higher income.
Overtime or regular time has nothing to do with it. Uncle Sam just looks at
the dollars you make in a week, or year, more dollars, higher tax rate.
Now the thing that averages it all out, when you do your taxes at the end of
the year the rate is based on your total pay for the year, so it pretty much
averages out the weeks you work massive over time.
Think of it this way, if you normally make $1,000 a week, you get taxed at a
$52,000 per year rate. If you work 4 weeks at $2,000 a week, for those 4
weeks you get taxed at a $104,000 per year rate, but when you do your year
end taxes you will get taxed at $56,000 per year rate. So you will acually
get tax money back for the weeks of OT.
Your actual tax rate charged when you file that final return sometime before
April 15 generally will NOT change based on your overtime. There is a slight
chance that your total income will increase to the point that you move over to
a higher tax bracket, but that will apply only to the income in excess of the
tax bracket break point.
That said, however, I believe that you are asking if the rate of WITHHOLDING
increases in your periodic paycheck. That very well could happen for various
reasons. First, your company's payroll departrment may not be very
sophisticated (especially if it is a small company not using a large payroll
service firm) and the withholding regulations are complex. Second, the
withholding regulations generally assume that what you made during any given
pay period is what you will make in ALL pay periods. This often grossly
overstates your estimated ANNUAL earnings, puts you into a higher assumed tax
bracket and causes the payroll dept to over withhold (this happens a lot with
annual bonus situations). Consider filing a new W-4 with additional dependents
for the overtime period, switch back after returning to normal hours. In any
case, the amount withheld does not impact your actual taxes. It only impacts
the size of your refund or additional payment when filing your return. If they
take more, the refund is higher (and you gave Uncle Sam an interest free loan).
If they take less the refund is smaller or you may owe at year end. If that is
the case, don't spend it all before tax time - Uncle Sam doesn't pay interest
on those "loans" but he sure charges interest and penalties if you don't pay on
firstname.lastname@example.org (Phil Crow) wrote in
Changes with gross pay, as has already been posted. However,
_bonuses_ have tax withheld at a higher rate, 40% IIRC. Where I work, our
"overtime" is treated as a bonus (has to do with the fact that we're sort
of salaried, sort of hourly), so tax is withheld from that at a higher
rate. The actual tax rate isn't any higher, but for some reason the
withholding rate is. We get most of that back at the end of the year; just
have to wait for it.
As an employer who does his own payroll, I suspect they are blanket taxing
the bonuses at 40% to keep from having to figure them through the tax
tables, consider each employees withholding status and them making an IRS
deposit each time they write bonus checks. In our business, we add the
bonuses into the regular paychecks to cut down on the caclulating overhead
and extra deposits to the IRS.
The tax withholding rate is based on a formula where:
Gross pay in any given pay period times number of pay periods per year
equals an estimated annual income. Based on your W-4 exemptions, the
withholding is estimated to be roughly equal to that pay-period's portion
of your total tax bill for the year.
The hook is that if you get paid 2 times/month, that's 24 paychecks
per year. If you make $10/hr times 40 hours per week, that's about
$935 gross per half-month (based on 187 hours per average month at
40 hrs/week). Thus a $935 gross paycheck calculates to an annual
income of about $22,440 per year.
On the other hand, if you work an extra 20 hours per week for a month,
your income goes up by 75%, or $1636 gross per check. That then looks
to the IRS withholding formula like you are making $37,270.
Let's say you are married and your exemptions and deductions are
about $12,000 per year, so your taxable income is about $10,000.
The tax on that would be somewhere around $1300-1500 per year.
BUT, if you had the same deductions and made $37,270, your taxable
income is $25,000 per year, and the tax on that is closer to $4000
per year, and the withholding for federal income tax per check
with overtime would be close to $175 instead of $50. Add to that
the additional social security tax of $55 or so for a total increase
of federal taxes of $180 plus additional state income tax, and that
knocks a big hole in your overtime income.
It's a screwed-up system, but it's the only game in town.
It seems many people know all about the tax rules, but what bothers me is
Phil's comments on taxes going away. If we don't pay taxes, who paves and
fixes roads, who pays for the fire engines and crews that come and attempt
to save your house and personal belongings, who pays for the cops that
protect you as best they can, who brings water to your house, takes used
water and waste away from your house, etc. This would be a sorry country if
we didn't have taxes. I agree that taxes are wasted much of the time, but if
we didn't have them, we wouldn't have much. My 2 cents.
All the things you mentioned are paid by city/count/state (local) taxes,
not Federal Income Tax - at least that's the way it's supposed to be.
Federal taxes are supposed to pay for the military/defense and
commerce/trade related things - at least that's the way it's supposed to
"Supposed to be" is right up there with "justice" as a concept, I think. We
don't see many things done as they're supposed to be done, nor is justice done
with any great regularity.
It would be interesting to see just how schools would fare today if all Federal
monies were cut off. Too, how many roads would we have without Federal support?
Start by doing a wipe on the entire Eisenhower concept, the Interstates.
"Man is a reasoning rather than a reasonable animal."
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:35:44 +0000, Charlie Self wrote:
All you gotta do is look at the trucking traffic on the interstates (at
least in the west) to realize they are a valid commerce item, unlike
Social Security and Medicare which for some strange reason have been
justified under the commerce clause. OTOH, I expect local taxes to fully
fund my side street after I have had a chance to vote on the bond issue.
email@example.com (Charlie Self) wrote in message
Federal support for schools is very small. In my District less than 1%
of total spending is federally funded. Roads are built by the feds
from federal gas taxes. We could build just as many roads if the feds
went away and the state levied the additional gas tax - we just
wouldn't be able to funnel it to those states and districts with the
"right" legislators and senators. A case in point is your Senator, Bob
Byrd, and all the road money he brings to WV. That extension of RT 50
being built in Parkersburg comes to mind.
Yeah. Now I'll have a nightmare tonight. That thing will be a lot better, and
safer, when it is completed. I hope it will, anyway, though I expect to be long
gone from the area by then.
Where does the money for school lunch funding come from? Why are so many school
districts so frightened of dropping student enrolments? Is all that a state
funding set-up? Seems to me I've read that much of it is federally funded.
Of course, the feds love to nail state and local agencies with grants. Expand
like crazy with whopping 2 year grants. At the end of 2 years you've got the
choice of letting the new stuff and staff go or paying for it yourself. Bedford
County, VA, has bought into this heavily with their sheriff's dept. Ex-FBI
agent elected shurf. Ever since, the dept. has been expanding on mostly federal
grant bucks. Some are due to start running out shortly, and one of the lowest
property tax rates in the state is due to go through the roof. Just about the
time I get back there, too.
"Man is a reasoning rather than a reasonable animal."
School Lunch and Breakfast programs are funded by a combination of federal,
state, and local tax dollars as well as the sale price of lunches. In our
district approximately 15% of the food service program is from federal funding,
with a substantial portion of that coming from food donations (this is actually
farm welfare where the feds set a minimum price for certain commodities and if
farmers can't sell what they grow for that price they sell it to the feds. the
feds then use it to donate to schools, for armed services, prisons , etc.).
Obviously, federal funds are focused on poorer school districts and the poorest
inner city schools and poor rural schools will get a higher percentage of both
education dollars as well as school lunch dollars (free and reduced lunch
subsidies for poor families). Still, nationally I believe that federal funding
amounts to considerably less than 5% of total K-12 education spending. Mostly
for remedial programs such as Title I reading and math, IDEA special education,
and some teacher continuing education programs (as well as the lunch/breakfast
programs). The vast majority of school funding in many states is state funding.
West Virginia funds a significant majority of school spending, with local taxes
- i.e. excess levies and bond levies- funding a small percentage. Other states
such as Pennsylvania focus a large percentage of school costs on local
taxpayers. PA state funding is about 35% on average. In my district it is about
18%. Just over 81% of our funding is from local (i.e. municipal or school
district specific) taxes - i.e. property taxes, local income taxes, local gross
receipts business taxes, amusement taxes, etc. and is heavily weighted toward
property taxes. Our local school property tax is 16.5 Mills or 1.65% of
assessed market value. This is on top of local municipal property taxes and
county property taxes. My total annual property tax is 28 mills or 2.8% of my
home's market value. Every state has its own formulas for distributing funding.
In many states out west it is very much based on number of students enrolled
AND attendance. They tend to spend a lot of money on tracking and enforcement
of attendance. In WV I think it is mostly enrollments, number and configuration
of buildings, geographic structure (for busing and for distribution of
schools). Even the structure of Districts vary widely from state to state. In
WV school districts are county-wide. so there are 55 school districts. In PA
the districts are much smaller and more numerous. In Allegheny County alone
there are 43 school districts - including the rather large city of Pittsburgh
District. The state has 501 districts. In Hawaii there is only 1 district - the
So, in a very long winded way I have bored the socks off anyone still reading
concerning school funding. For the libertarians amongst us (as well as the
states rights folks) schools are still very much a state function as they
should be under the US constitution. The feds are constantly encroaching
however. Our nice conservative republican Geo. Bush recently passed the "No
Child Left Behind Act" which, whether you like its purpose and intent or not,
is clearly the largest transfer of eduction control to the federal government
in history (without matching funding, by the way). Some may say it is a victory
for children, but it is clearly a defeat for constitutional law.
Well if Michigan quit sending the federal portion of gasoline taxes
and used it to pave Michigan roads, we in Michigan would have better
roads. Yes, we are a DONOR State.
Federal Support = FEDERAL DEMANDS
Whiskey Echo Sierra Sierra AT Gee Tee EYE EYE dot COM
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.