Buried parts and plans are strong evidence that Saddam had every intention
of starting a nuclear program back up once he manipulated the UN and
OK Fred, what was I thinking? My bad. Yes, Bush completely ignored new
evidence so that Halliburton could make some money, and that the Bush family
would be in good graces with the Saudis and the Skull and Crossbones Society
would remain in control of the Trilateral commission. I get it now.
I heard that Ritter was paid $500,000 if I recall correctly by the Iraqi
government indirectly for a book or something. I forget the details, but
Ritter has some skeletons in the closet. The Salon article makes a lot more
sense, but it doesn't fit into your conspiracy theory.
Note I used the words "you seem."
You may be right. I believe some evidence was made more of than should have
been, but what is happening now is Monday morning quarterbacking. I also
believe strongly that going into Iraq was the right thing to do. Also,
impartiality has nothing to do with effectiveness. In the long run, you
can't keep a guy like Saddam from doing what he ultimately aims to do. I
think the history of his relationship with the UN and others proves this
(bribes, weakening of sanctions, etc).
No, FRED, I don't know what claim you are asking me about. I think it got
clipped out somewhere along the line. I didn't ask you what the Duelfer
report was. I'm not inclined to spend much more time on this thread anyway.
Nobody is convincing anybody of anything here.
Lighten up, Francis.
Wrong. Saddam was not cooperative in any way shape or form. Libya was
cooperative. The difference was day and night. You are unfortunately being
duped into a false sense of security by Saddam and you don't even know it.
I'm to have characterized you so because I know it annoys you, but I calls
'em as I sees 'em.
It's probably best you reply on the politics groups you had this thread
crosslinked with, and we'll leave these poor woodworking people alone
already as you suggested on the other thread.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.