:On 2008-04-21, Dan Musicant ( snipped-for-privacy@privacy.net) wrote: : :> I don't think I even keep the aerator on there. Is there a good :> reason to do so? I thought it was more or less a flow restriction :> device (which I don't need since I self-regulate that!), or a means :> of filtering (post stem!), and since I don't cook with or drink hot :> water I figure why bother? : :Without an aerator, the flow will be very chaotic if you ever open it :up all the way. An aerator can and will limit flow, but that :shouldn't be a problem for you.
I thought I might not be using an aerator, but it turned out I am. When I removed it actually, the full flow didn't seem chaotic at all. I'd already put a full flow through the pipe with the aerator on, and maybe because of that there was quite a bit of a variety of sized particles on the screen. So far, there's no dripping, so I'm hopeful that flushing like this resolves the problem for the time being. If I do decide to replace the galvanized, I'll do copper and as you describe with the brass fitting.
Thanks...
Dan : :> So, if I do decide to replace the old galvanized I'm restricted to more :> galvanized or copper? : :Any water supply pipes you replace should be copper--it doesn't make :sense to install galvanized given its performance, and PEX is not :approved here, as previously mentioned. To connect the new copper to :your existing galvanized, the best solution is to use a 6" brass :nipple (or stainless steel? not sure if stainless is OK) with a female :threaded galvanized fitting on one side, and a copper sweat to female :threaded adapter on the other end. A "nipple" is just a short section :of (threaded) pipe. : :Cheers, Wayne