When a cyclist uses a busy road, he slows down all the cars, making them less efficient, using a lower gear, overtaking, changing speed, etc. So you bastards aren't green at all.
- posted
5 years ago
Cyclists waste petrol
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
It's "breathe".
And text consumes f*ck all bandwidth.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Plenty 4x4s, which you lot call trucks. A truck is actually a lorry and weighs 50 tonnes fully laden.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
You bastards dinnae like it when you're cycling on the cheap shit non-steamrolled tarmac and the stone chips fly into your face. Ha!
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
+1 Especially if riding in groups wearing lycra.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Around here they just run over the cyclists. If the F350 doesn't get them the horse trailer will..
I'm becoming a pussy in my old age and really like dedicated bike paths. Sharing narrow, shoulderless roads with traffic isn't my thing anymore.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
If it ain't a Mercedes-Benz G63 AMG 6×6 it ain't a real truck.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Cars aren't allowed to drive two abreast, so why cyclists?
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Sharing them when there's a cycle path right next to the bloody road is insanity, yet they all do it around here.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Anyone with a BMW or Merc has more money than sense.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
It is illegal here. Nobody ever gets charged tho.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Police cars are perfectly capable of flattening cyclists, why do they not do so?
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Too much paperwork to do after doing that.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Prick.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Cyclist lover. Pounder likes seeing their buttocks gyrating in lycra.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Paperwork should be illegal. It's high time all white collar workers were shot.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
When I'm in a bunch of traffic going 40mph, I'm in 5th gear driving economically. Then a cyclist makes us all go 20mph, and I'm in 4th. That uses more.
Yes. You can't drive slowly in 5th. Therefore the engine is turning over more times for the same distance.
Show me a car that drives happily in 5th at 20mph.
Most ignore the limit and drive at an economical speed. Certainly a steady one and certainly in top gear.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Hardly anyone drives like that.
I drive around town in 3rd and only use 4th in the higher speed limit areas if in one for a while. Only use 5th gear when in the 100Km or 110Km areas.
And everyone else stays in the same gear and goes slower, that that uses less.
Nope. Only fools are in 5th at that speed.
Not when you have enough of a clue to be in the same gear regardless of cyclists.
None of us are stupid enough to be in 5th all the time when doing 40mph and you cant do that even if there are no cyclists anyway.
But only go a bit above that. And often cant even drive at the speed limit because of the traffic even if there are no cyclists.
Even sillier than you usually manage, and that's saying something.
Even sillier than you usually manage, and that's saying something.
Even sillier than you usually manage, and that's saying something.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
You must have really congested towns. I can sit happily in 5th at 30 or 40mph. But cyclists don't go that fast.
Usually 10-15mph over.
You need to move to a quieter area.
At least try to engage in the conversation.
- Vote on answer
- posted
5 years ago
Nope.
Bullshit, and hardly anyone is stupid enough to do that in 5th anyway.
Most arent actually stupid enough to stay in 5th except when there are cyclists.
BULLSHIT.
Nope. I'm not stupid enough to drive around in the built up areas in 5th.
I did.