I think that his comment was more directed at the magazine than at women woodworkers.
It's like having a financial magazine for women. 'Money' magazine came out with a women's edition which was totally dumbed-down compared to it's mainstream counterpart. That definitely sends the message that in order to gain women's interest in a subject that has classically been direct toward men, that the topic would have to be simplified.
It just plain makes no sense why there would need to be a seperate woodworking magazine for women. The wood doesn't care who is working it. The exact same principles, techniques, and tools apply, regardless of the gender of the user. So, what is there to differentiate them. Content. Articles will probably be something like:
"Blue, Yellow, Red, Green. Why don't power tools come in prettier colors?" "How to build a display shelf for your antique doll collection." "Tool Review: Dremel attachments for nail polishing. Manicures made easy."
I saw it on the newsstand, but didn't think it worthy of even a quick thumb-through. I mean, really, what's the point?
codepath
"Woodworking