| On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:36:50 -0600, with neither quill nor qualm, | "Morris Dovey" quickly quoth: | || Larry Jaques (in snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com) said: | ||| So is it better to sue for many of the funds the corporation owns ||| or is it better to force the corporation to rid itself of these ||| idiots? The former increases costs paid by you and me. || || This is a question each of us needs to consider. For myself alone: || I am willing to pay a share of the cost for those I care about to || live in a free, fair, and just society - and you might be a bit || surprised at the number of people I care about - and by just how || much I happen to care. | | Oy, another bleedin' Liberal, are ya? You guys are expensive. ;) | (Not that "Conservative" Shrub has done any better on the other side | of the aisle.) Just remember what ol' Ben said | before they stuck his profile on a big bill. | | "He who sacrifices freedom for security is neither free nor secure." | -- Benjamin Franklin
Hmmm. If "giving a damn" makes me "another bleeding liberal" than I guess that's what I am. I believe that in even (perhaps /especially/) in the most free of societies, one can choose to contribute in ways that seem appropriate and desirable to oneself.
If "bleeding liberal" is an epithet to you or you have misgivings about my willingness to "pay my share of the cost", a few of the "payments" are listed at the bottom of
formatting link
I don't think Ben would object much to any of my choices.
In spite of all of his carefully preserved wise words, I'm not certain that Franklin understood the true essence of freedom in all its fullness - I /am/ certain, beyond any shadow of doubt, that both Nathan Hale and Mahatma Gandhi /did/.
My reading is that the Shrub hasn't a clue; and that if somehow he arrived at that understanding in some epiphany, he'd find the implications truly terrifying.
-- Morris Dovey DeSoto Solar DeSoto, Iowa USA
formatting link