I have been using a Delta shaper/router for several years and it has
served me well. I now need to upgrade since I have started to use a lot of
6/4 and 8/4 materials and the Delta is only a 1/2 HP. I use router bits
exclusively now and doubt that I will need shaper heads in the future.
Which ever I get I will also get a power feeder for it.
The router or shaper will be installed in the right side of my TS which
has a 50" fence and uses a 1.5 HP dust collector. I am looking at the
Grizzly 1 1/2 HP shaper or getting another ( my fourth) Hitachi 12V router,
3 1/4 HP, variable speed, soft start etc. and if I go with the router it
will be used exclusively on the table.
I run a one man shop and weekly average use of shaper/router will be about
Grizzly pros no time spent building table
cons $200 more than a router and materials but I won't spend
several days building table.
1 1/2 HP as opposed to 3 1/4HP
Comments or suggestions. TIA
Search back...this has been up many times.
The router is more versatile and much safer. Get one and learn to use it.
Build a simple table and learn to use that. Then, if yoou know you need it,
think about the router.
The big difference is that the router follows the board surface. If your
wood is twisted, warped, or varies in thinkness, the shaper will not work
correctly. If you make your own lumber, or salvage, or just don't get
perfedt stock, this will be a problem.
The shaper is much more powerful and there's no contest for raising panels
with big cutters, BUT there are vertical panel raiser bits that overcome
this problem to some extent, I think. I haven't used one, but it seems the
answer if you want a wide cut.
I think there are much better things to buy, UNLESS you are doing a lot of
panels. All the other door cuts are easy with a router, especially in a
If you aren't going to use a large (5") panel raiser, the router is a fine
deal. It's better on small stuff.. I love the big panel raiser, but it
really needs 3 HP.. The wider raiser lends considerable class to doors, but
you may be able to accomplish the same with vertical panel raising bits.
I have the Griz 1.5 HP shaper for about 5 years. I got
it mainly because I figured it would cost the same
or more for a good router table. IIRC I paid around
$400. Got the extension wing and the router spindle
attachment at the same time - so I can use any router
bit with the shaper. The only disadvantage is that the shaper
has only 2 speeds (12K & 9K I think). Sometimes that's
a little slow for a router bit.
It is great for raised panels using one of those 3/4 bore
3 wing bits (I use an MLCS for around $70). Another
nice feature is the raise/lower handle & lock - similar
to a TS. Also, it is pretty hefty and seems to have plenty of
power for my needs.
OTOH, I have also been toying with the idea of mounting
an extra router that I don't use much on my TS too. Just
to have it available for smaller jobs or when I don't want
to have to switch out the shaper spindle for the router spindle.
A downside to shaper bits is their cost. I only have about
a half dozen shaper bits - the cope/stick & panel bits are
used most of the time.
I would definitely buy it again if I were making the same
Apples and oranges.
1 1/2 HP of induction motor vs 3 1/4 HP for a universal motor...at
10.000 RPM with a large panel raising cutter..the shaper will seem so
much stronger than 1-1/2HP.
The shaper will work its butt off all day. The Hitachi (I own a couple)
will be working its ballbearings off.
The shaper heads/cutters cost a lot more money if you're talking carbide.
The shaper set-up is a lot more complex/involved.
The shaper speed change usually involves re-tightening of the belt(s).
The shaper is much quieter.
I don't know about the Grizzly, but a lot of shapers can take a chuck
for 1/2" router bits, so the investment you have won't go to waste.
But... if you're going to lean into it with a hunk of 8/4 oak... a 1-1/2
HP shaper may not be adequate either.
A router table is a cheap and dirty but will not do a shaper's job over
the long haul.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.