I agree with almost everything you said, Dave, but want to point out that a CAD program does *not* suggest that objects are static. It's a representation of the real world, not the real world itself. Anyone who doesn't realize that tools are capable of being moved around has no business playing with them in the first place.
Here are some clues that the equipment is meant to be moved:
"...jointer is easily moved away from wall for use" "...dust collector near door: easy to roll outside" "...belt sander easily repositioned for long pieces" "...router table ...can be moved away easily" "...oscillating sander can use router table..." "...thickness planer moves to the assembly table" "...Sheet goods bin ...2" metal wheels allow it to swing away from the lumber rack." "...sharpening station (on wheels)" "...mechanic's tool chest (on wheels)"
I disagree when you say that "The best way to arrange is in the shop; not on the pc." Pushing many hundreds of pounds of equipment back and forth to find the best location takes second place to a little intelligent forethought and planning, and that's *exactly* what CAD programs are designed for. And this particular program allows one to move stuff around in real time, just by clicking and dragging, including in 3-D, all in exact scale. You really should take a look at it. Hey, it beats sweating any time, and it darned sure beats purchasing a piece of equipment only to find out later that you don't really have the proper space for it. Probably if I was less that 2000 miles away from my shop, I would do a little pushing and shoving, but I'm not, so I can't!
Sorry if I sound testy, Dave: maybe I am just misinterpreting the tone of your message. It's just that you seem to be saying the exact same things in your note that I said in my post, but with a scolding tone. Maybe it's just me. I really do look for positive and constructive feedback, Dave, and hope I haven't reacted to hastily.
DanD