OT - Wondering about spam

Page 2 of 2  
wrote:

Rather unreliable and slow.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

See the Internet standard RFC1149. It doesn't make it faster, but it solves the reliability problem.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1149.html
--
Sending unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account incurs a fee of
$500 per message, and acknowledges the legality of this contract.
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 24 May 2004 00:55:35 GMT, Bruce Barnett

Thanks, that one goes in the "FunStuff" references! :-)
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Notice the date it was released. April 1st. Other "standards" have been released on this date. It used to be a USENET tradition. For instance, we used to announce when new sites got connected to USENET for the purposes of exchanging news. (Not all sites had a IP connection. Some used dialup protocols.) In fact, the only way to get a direct connection to the ARPAnet was to be a vendor to the US government. So in 1984, we saw this announcement:
http://www.2meta.com/april-fools/1984/kremvax.html
--
Sending unsolicited commercial e-mail to this account incurs a fee of
$500 per message, and acknowledges the legality of this contract.
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.