OT: Kentucky Loser

Page 3 of 3  


I hope you're not collecting that socialist hand-out social security are you?
Get back to work you lazy ass.

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

If that is the case (it's not), why was more debt needed to pay the "benefits"?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

---------------------------------------- The question has already been answered.
Try getting up to speed before pounding keyboard.
Lew
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 11:33:43 -0800, "Lew Hodgett"

Gettin' a little cranky aren't we.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 03/01/2010 02:15 PM, Gordon Shumway wrote:

_Getting_ cranky? Hell, "Cranky" is Lew's middle name. :-)
--
What percentage of the driving populace do you suppose actually
understands the rules of engagement at a four-way stop?
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

I didn't see you answer, only the dumbass statement.

Google wasn't showing me the rest of the thread. It gets confused.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote:

Well, that and the fact that the original occurrence of that statement came in a sequence in which the statement was made that it would make more sense to use some of the unspent Porkulus funds to pay for this extension of benefits rather than to create even more new debt, then the statement was made that jobs were available if one looked hard enough to which Lew replied:
"Spoken like a truly pathetic bigot.
Unemployment payments come from unemployment insurance funds and are not a handout."
My point with my original statement was the fact that those unemployment payments are NOT coming from insurance funds since those funds are now depleted. Those extended unemployment benefits are, at this time a handout, and at the minimum are taking money from someone else, who, given the current debt situation, has yet to be born let alone work a single day of his/her life. The question raised by the congressman is still valid -- why add even more to this debt when unspent Porkulus funds are still available?
--

There is never a situation where having more rounds is a disadvantage

Rob Leatham
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Lew Hodgett wrote:

Unemployment "insurance" is mandatory on businesses. In that regard, it differs little from a "tax."
When the fund is depleted, the only way to replenish it is by raising the "tax."
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.