It's purely coincidental, but I just finished adding "Team USA -
Kentucky" to the list of solar engine R&D folks (see bottom of page).
(Photos and video)
Lew, are you talking about the Puffington Host screwing up on the
title of the article? You're right, it's nothing new. Bunning would
have happily voted for the bill had it used stimulus money instead of
adding more to the deficit. Are you opposed to his concept or to the
extension of unemployment funding? WTF,O?
Pessimist: One who, when he has the choice of two evils, chooses both.
--Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
Bunning is simply playing the "No" bit to the hilt.
Bunning was a pretty decent pitcher, but can't say the same about his
so it's an accounting problem?
If you get past the loaded words and misdirection on huff-po and focus on
what he is saying, you find the man has some very valid points. $500B of
Porkulus has not yet been spent, why not use that money instead of adding
yet more debt for our children and grandchildren to pay?
There is never a situation where having more rounds is a disadvantage
Spoken like someone with a job.
***This is not the program that needs to be screwed with in order to
balance the budget when so many Americans (including me) are dependent
on these funds.***
Balance the budget using the 100's of other methods.
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:27:51 -0800 (PST), GarageWoodworks
That program is not being screwed with. It's the liberals that want
to spend even more unbudgeted money (aka: my tax dollars) on that
program rather than using stimulus funds (aka: my tax dollars). In my
opinion the benefits are available far too long as it is.
There are plenty of jobs available for those willing to work. The
jobs may not be what one desires but there are jobs available. The
problem is exacerbated by the fact that the benefits are greater than
some of the available jobs so the mind set of "why should I work when
I can goof off and get more" has prevailed That fundamental flaw of
the program needs to be screwed with.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.