Frank Boettcher wrote: ...
...
That there is no direct correlation of the magnitude of a measurement of the vertical post alignment to the actual misalignment of the guide blocks for an adjustment on the height into an actual performance statistic for the saw as just one example. The last review in FWW mentions the misalignment can cause a need for readjustment as a general reason for looking at it but gave no guidelines at all on how much is too much or would be considered acceptable.
That "smaller is better" is a given, but whether 3 or 10 or 30 is really, really bad isn't clear to a general audience who is looking to buy a saw for the first time, certainly, which is a large part of the target audience of such reviews.
I'd be terribly surprised if you could take a sample of the readers of any of the general circulation magazines and have even 5% of those who are owners of a bandsaw and could come anyways close to telling either what their saw measured for that statistic or had ever actually measured it or thought to.
And it still doesn't address the issue of how the distribution of individual machine measurements correlate to the measurements of the population of machines of which the tested one was a single sample.
All I'm pointing out is that w/o some context, the reviews have some merit but could be more informative than they are but recognizing there are limitations to the format.
Don't know what you're seemingly so angry over or feel the need to denigrate, but whatever you say...
--