IRS Auctions, Woodworking Tools, Machines.

I came across IRS site auctioning woodworking tools etc.
http://www.irsauctions.com/index_lots.asp?pg ήtails&idt22
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Sorry, bidding over!

Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Note that in this context IRS = Industrial Recovery Services, not the well-known government agency having the same initials.
-- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com)
Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com You must use your REAL email address to get a response.
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 00:46:04 GMT, snipped-for-privacy@milmac.com (Doug Miller) wrote:

I was looking for sanding rolls for my new toy when I accidentally came upon what I thought the IRS (you know who). I believe there are a few nice woodworking tools and machines in their Dec. auctions.
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

Note that "IRS" != "Internal Revenue Service."
Mike Beede
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Mike Beede responds:

Not that IRS on that site=Industrial Recovery Service.
Charlie Self "It is when power is wedded to chronic fear that it becomes formidable." Eric Hoffer
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Charlie Self wrote:

Computer insider jargon I think went over your head, Charlie. != is C/C++ (and probably other languages) for "not equals."
--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan < snipped-for-privacy@users.sourceforge.net>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Silvan wrote:

Indeed. Works in C and in C++, too. ;-)
Same as '<>' in at least some versions of BASIC and .NE. in FORTRAN II and IV.
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Morris Dovey wrote:

...
Just for the record Fortran is now Fortran and F95 compilers are present generation although the F2003 Standard is now current...w/F90 standard Fortran also recognizes /= as a synonym and beginning w/ F77 was no longer all uppercase.
.
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Duane Bozarth wrote:

Seems pretty reasonable. I abandoned FORTRAN IV in favor of C before F77; and never looked back, except for a single NASA project using the Data General "Fortran 5" compiler (which had optimizing capabilities that /still/ dazzle me.)
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Silvan responds:

Probably zipped by 90% of the readers on here, too.
Charlie Self "Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." George Orwell
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Charlie Self wrote:

Probably. I meant no slight. You can't help being a luser. 90% or better of computer users in the world today are lusers. :)
--
Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan < snipped-for-privacy@users.sourceforge.net>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Spend some time looking over that site. $500.00 Unisaws! Lots of good stuff! I am all the way out on the left coast. Shipping would kill me1
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Anybody else notice that the old iron was going for almost nothing? For all the bitching about the deline in Unisaw quality and foreign manufacturing, they still go for double the price of a Whitney table saw. Odd, considering the Whitney machines we've got at work- they're a damn fine toolmaker, and they're US based. That sucker looked like it weighed about 2500 pounds! Dirty, sure- but cleanup seems like a small price to pay for a saw with a 2" thick iron table... It's sort of a shame, really.
BTW, thanks for the link- I'll be bookmarking this one.
Aut inveniam viam aut faciam
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Prometheus wrote:

While I would agree that a Baxter Whitney is a gazzilion times the saw that a Unisaw is there is the small fact about it's size which makes it a wee bit hard to get down the basement stairs. There is also the problem of phase (my convertor only goes up to 5 horse) which makes it not doable by a large percentage.
On the other hand, the prices of smaller single phase machinery (Unisaw class) has steadily risen over the last few years.
UA100
Add pictures here
βœ–
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.