That's what I figured. I remember working with the stuff in the late
80s and early 90s and it was pretty nasty. The OSB that's out now is much different. It's still OSB, so it is what it is. But I've found it to be much improved over the stuff from 25 years ago.
If you ever run across Advantech or Norbord Truflor, check them out. They are very advanced OSB subflooring sheets and are great to work with and strong as an ox. Also, they are very water resistant.
So for flooring the companies that make the mortar, or glues do not recommend OSB under any tile, or stone. There has to be a reason.
But I would probably agree that the product has changed, but that doesn't help my problem of it being CRAP. It won't even hold a screw, it just flakes away... garbage. Have you been following the AZEK suits. The product is quickly failing in many locations.. yes there are many sucesses too. The problem is where it is failing. The company says we don't guarantee the look, but the product is cracking, chalking, etc... why would you buy a product that in less than a year is failing. Same with the OLD OSB.. it's crap.. that I will pay 4 times for. I have already started replacing sheathing. I have aluminum siding. So I have to replace sheathing, wrap, siding... And who's to pay.. I don't have that problem with PLY. Are the manufacturers going to pay... hell no. They sell it and walk away...
You shouldn't put tile down over any wood product. Period. That's what cement board is for. I use Schluter-DITRA between sub-floor and tile and will never use cement board again.
Great product, not always handy when "we need two more rolls" is heard, a bit pricy for some budgets, but worth it when buildup of layers between floors is an issue.
If you were to in any way compare OSB and Advantec (engineered subfloor composite board) I would argue most strenuously. They are not the same product. Not even close. In the first place, OSB is made cheaply to cover large areas economically, where strength is not key. The engineered subfloor is very strong, and used because it does not suffer from delaminating and voids as modern plywood seems to suffer. It is also quite expensive, in comparison to OSB.
Advantec is still not to be used under tile because no wood is rated for direct contact with masonry unless is is treated, and Advantec is not. Wood also does not have the same coefficients of expansion as tile, and therefore is not a good choice of material for bonding to masonry. Advantec, however, shows very little signs of swelling or coming apart in flakes when exposed to the weather, even for long periods of time. I have seen it weather for nearly a year with very little changes other than discoloration.
Yes, but they put it under slate in the entry way. So it's all cracking. I already partially repaired it once b4, it's still continuing, so at some time I will lift and replace the whole area and figure what we'll put down after. If tile or stone I'll use cement board.. but I am about to do my kitchen floor, removing the subfloor and putting cement board down there.
The wife does not want to upgrade the kitchen, only the floor, which I think is a mistake... might as well do it all, but SWMBO rules... a happy wife.....
No, you are entirely correct they are not the same product.
That said, Advantech is indeed technically an "oriented strand board" (OSB) product in the way it is manufactured, just like both are technically "plywood".
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.