Hock 'classic' vs. cryogenic irons

Has anyone who has used both comment on any differences?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
wrote:

I have a "classic" Hock iron in my #5 and it holds an edge very well. When I replaced the iron in #8, the local Woodcraft had a cryo, so I tried it. It holds its edge very well also, but I'm not convinced that the price difference was worth it. It is obvious that the cryo is harder when honing, but I'm not noting any substantial evidence of improved edge-holding.
Paul.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

It's much harder, and will hold an edge far longer. I hated it though. It's much harder to lap and hone initially (several hours and a lot of elbow grease). I prefer honing withouht having to think about it.I'll never get a cryo blade again.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Gordon Airporte wrote:

Thanks guys. Somehow I hadn't considered ease of sharpening as a factor.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.