Designing

As a professional what? You don't even know what I do.

No, I mean Byte is not a C/C++ keyword. We went from modeling and complexity to trivia. Aim high.

Reply to
Bill
Loading thread data ...

I thought you talked about programming for a government contractor.

I don't know how to spell C (or at least I have my boss convinced), but:

formatting link
"Various implementations of C and C++ define a "byte" as 8, 9, 16, 32, or 36 bits" [1]

[1] "The C++ language guarantees a byte must always have at least 8 bits. But there are implementations of C++ that have more than 8 bits per byte."

Reading it again, perhaps they're really talking about "Char".

Reply to
krw

Yes, I did that 25 years ago.

Yes, They define "byte" but not "Byte" as I said. C is case-sensitive.

You mean "char"? :)

Maybe you are a Java or C# programmer?

Reply to
Bill

That's as "complex" as it gets.

Reply to
Lobby Dosser

If you go looking for complexity you will find it.

You happen to be among those who look for and even expect complexity. It's not there.

Reply to
Lobby Dosser

How complex can you get in 6 bits?

Reply to
Lobby Dosser

No, Bill, it is not. LOC has nothing to do with 'complexity'.

Reply to
Lobby Dosser

So?

Reply to
Lobby Dosser

True; these days a half a million lines of code isn't a lot. I used to work on OS/2, and though most of it was written in C, a fair amount of the underlying low-level system was implemented in assembler. I really don't have any idea what the line count would have been, but I'd guess 500K wouldn't be too far off the mark. That was a LOT of assembler code. :-)

Reply to
Steve Turner

Another reason I despise C.

You gotta be kidding. I'm a hardware designer. It's either assembler or VHDL. If it's not programmed at the metal, they can find someone cheaper. I want no part of it. ;-)

Reply to
krw

I'd heard, from the developers, OS/2 was more like 2M LOC.

Reply to
krw

For just the assembler? That could be; I've never seen the actual line counts. I could probably go off and perform the counts myself if I didn't have better things to do; I still have access to the source. :-)

Reply to
Steve Turner

That's what they told us on the IBMPC FORUM, back in the "weak in the knees" days.

Reply to
krw

I know what you mean, but you don't appear open to the notion that complexity can have more than 1 form. Let's go back to chopping wood..I hate bickering.

Bill

Reply to
Bill

The only thing I hated more than assembler was COBOL. Thankfully the only thing I ever had to do with COBOL was grade a student project.

Reply to
Lobby Dosser

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.