I am looking to buy this holesaw:
- posted
17 years ago
I am looking to buy this holesaw:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:33:26 +0100, JoeJoe wrote (in article ):
I believe that this is the correct one - I have a few cutters from this range. There is a smaller arbor which is used with smaller cutters and which does not have the two projecting pins to lock in the top of the cutter to prevent rotation.
The web site descriptions and photos of the various arbors are somewhat screwed up. This one is not an SDS fitting (at least on mine)
You could call them and check. FWIW, B&Q carry this range as well.
If you think you might be using several different cutters then the packs (11002 or 18459) give a lower price.
Why is there nearly 37 minutes between you posting after me and your post has gone before me?
Or is your clock gone skeewiff?
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 00:06:49 +0100, The3rd Earl Of Derby wrote (in article ):
No idea
All of my server and desktop machine clocks are NTP synchronised and correct.
One point to note with the screwfix one, it has a hex shank that will not fit in a 3/8" chuck - it needs at least a 1/2" chuck. This may be an issue on some cordless drills.
In message , The3rd Earl Of Derby writes
Because Andys was posted before yours.
Andy's was posted at 22:54 BST, yours was posted at 23.33 BST., it would appear that your newsreader is not displaying the correct time, have a look at the headers.
No, but your newsreader seem to be broken.
I post the reply to the OP 17 minutes before MrHalls.
My clock says 13:30 lets see at what time it stamps the date on the NG?
Yup 1 minute slow so it appears my posting is near enough spot on.
He asked wether the arbours would fit the cutter.
Because the 11mm shank is bigger than the 10mm maximum opening of the smaller chucks obviously.
He did indeed. You pointed out that arbours and cutters are often interchangeable (he did not ask about that either!), and I was adding some extra information that the OP may wish to consider when selecting an arbour.
Lol you read it wrong what I meant was why didn't you tell the OP.
Not according to the message headers.
From Andy's headers:
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 22:54:56 +0100
X-Original-Trace: 8 Jul 2006 22:55:34 +0100, 10.0.0.48
i.e. posted at 22.54.56 BST (the +0100 indicates a 1 hour later offset from UTC - because we are in BST))
From your headers:
Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 22:33:36 GMT
X-Trace: text.news.blueyonder.co.uk 1152398016 82.42.220.188 (Sat, 08 Jul 2006 23:33:36 BST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 23:33:36 BST
Note the Date header from your news client is in GMT, the headers indicate your message was posted at 23.33.36 BST - 39 minutes later
Maybe it was displaying Andy's time incorrectly? BTW this is being posted at 23.16 BST (23.16 +0100 UTC)
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.