where to start in welding

I'd start with a straight forward arc welder (stick welder) ... much cheaper than mig. You will learn good technique. Loads of how-to videos on youtube

If Junior gets fed up ... not lost a lot of money.

A single phase welder in the 180amp range will do you up to 4mm rods Will run off a 13A plug on all but highest settings.

( I added a 16A socket to my garage to allow full power use)

Reply to
rick
Loading thread data ...

agree .... learn stick, mig has its benefits, but a good grounding in stick welding is the way to go.

Reply to
rick

A lot of juniors would say 'do you know any celebs that weld? Forget it then. I'm not lowering myself to that.'

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

You could reply Billy Connolly who was a boilermaker though he may be too old to be a Celeb to a 16 year old. Possibly Nicholas Parsons as well , despite his somewhat cultured presentation his parents insisted he took an apprenticeship in engineering so he spent the war years in Glasgow at a pump factory doing so.

G.Harman

Reply to
damduck-egg

And of course Mr. Dibnah. And that annoying twonk Guy Martin. I'm glad I haven't watched tv in years.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

Annoying he might be, but he has a certain amount of technical knowledge and plenty of enthusiasm. Not to mention balls.

Fred Dibnah was rather like Marmite to IMechE members. Personally, I am pretty sure George Stephenson would have approved.

To my mind, anyone who can raise the profile of engineering to the younger generation has to be a good thing. Those of us who were raised in the 1950's won't forget the influence of rocketry, V Bombers, Calder Hall, and all the other new technology.

Reply to
newshound

+1

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

You might be interested to know there is rather a large choice of channels now, so you're not forced to watch either Dibna or Martin. Not that you ever were anyway.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

There have been for years. Almost all of it a bad way to spend a big chunk of one's life.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

The amount of time anyone spends watching TV isn't compulsory.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

That's really informative.

Reply to
tabbypurr

But a pleasant way to spend a small part of it.

Reply to
Clive George

As was your comment of not having watched TV in years. Which I very much doubt is true.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

So this thread has degenerated to stupid too. At least I've had a productive day.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

Pleasant for some, perhaps, but generally mind-rotting. Doesn't do much for one's physique, either.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

Which is something Plowman could never honestly say.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

If one watched 2 hours of tv an evening, 2hrs x 80 years = 58,400 hrs. That's 1,460 x 40 hour working weeks, or 28 years of full time employment wasted on mindless junk.

Yet at the same time, so many people wish they had the time to do various things in their lives! It's nuts. No... I do not watch tv.

NT

Reply to
tabbypurr

It's entirely possible to watch a lot less than 14 hours of TV in a week yet still enjoy what there is.

Reply to
Clive George

You've been watching tv, and you think stating the totally obvious is in some way useful. Might there be a connection?

Reply to
tabbypurr

Well, observation of your posts over the past few years shows you do seem to have a lot of trouble missing the totally obvious - and you're also not exactly immune from stating it at other times.

Reply to
Clive George

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.