SWA earth

Could you clarify what I've read on Google groups?

  • For an outbuilding, a separate TT earth is required/recommended, provided by an earth rod.
  • The power itself is provided by a 2 core SWA cable carrying live and neutral.
  • The armour of the SWA is connected to earth.

Is this correct, and to which earth should the SWA armour be connected, the house, or the garage?

Reply to
Stephen Gower
Loading thread data ...

yup. Exporting the house earth is OK for a garage nice and close to the house (nearly-attached or just a yard or two away); much further and the TT route is somewhat better.

You connect the SWA armour to the house earth: that'll give you the best (lowest-impedance) path back in the unlikely event of a live-to-earth fault in the body of the cable (spade, mole with titanium false teeth, or similar). At the outbuiling end you keep the SWA armour isolated from the consumer unit - glands to do this are available, or you can just terminate at an all-insulated CU.

That's the accumulated wisdom I've gathered from this 'ere group!

Stefek

Reply to
stefek.zaba

"Stephen Gower" wrote | Could you clarify what I've read on Google groups? | * For an outbuilding, a separate TT earth is required/recommended, | provided by an earth rod.

Required if the supply to the house is PME or the outbuilding is more than a certain distance away.

| * The power itself is provided by a 2 core SWA cable carrying live | and neutral. | * The armour of the SWA is connected to earth. | Is this correct, and to which earth should the SWA armour be | connected, the house, or the garage?

Yes, and the SWA is earthed at the house end. At the garage end you can either use an insulated CU or a special gland which insulates the armour.

Owain

Reply to
Owain

Hi,

This is an interesting matter which has puzzled me for a while. According to an IEE source, when I enquired a while ago, the main requirement for whether or not to use a local earth rod, is if the earth fault loop impedance (Zs) becomes too high, at the outbuilding. This is related to the distance, size of cable, and MCB used, and Ze reading of the source. If Zs is low enough then I was advised to use the main house earth.

I have not come across the PME factor?

Interestingly I am in negotiations to fit a new supply to a barn/ workshop from a house - which presently is on a TT supply, but will soon be PME (It will be PME by the time the new feed is in use). The barn is some 20m away, and will probably have a 6mm XLPE cable. I am planning to have a local RCD in the barn. The supply cable (in the house) won't be on an RCD.

I'd value some guidance on this.

Thanks, John

Reply to
John Watson

Unless of course you 'export' the house PME earth satisfactorily to the garage (it would have to be with more than just the CPC conductor of an ordinary cable) and connect all exposed metalwork there to it as well. Not a very practical approach in a domestic situation but the more one moves towards a serious workshop the more sense it might make.

Reply to
usenet

Is there a specification or a general rule as to how far away an outbuilding can be before it requires it's own local earthing arrangement? I've looked through past posts but couldn't find such a figure mentioned.

cheers Richard

-- Richard Sampson

email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk

Reply to
RichardS

As I understand it, you'll have to ensure the earth loop impedence is within spec, which gets increasingly difficult with longer cable runs and increased power. Also, you have to run main equipotential bonding back to the earthing terminal by the consumer unit in UNBROKEN thick earthing cable. This is an issue if you have metallic services, or structural metalwork.

Christian.

Reply to
Christian McArdle

OK, so reading into this answer, it will depend upon the expected usage in the outbuilding along with the construction. For instance, for a supply to a wooden shed that has outlets used for portable power tools it may be acceptable to export the house earth, but if there's structural metalwork, and fixed machinery (eg tablesaws) then a separate earthing arrangement would be the only acceptable solution?

In my case, it's a wooden shed about 12m from the house, with portable power tools being used in it...

For the equipotential bonding issue your answer implies that the SWA would have to be run right back to the CU and terminated there, rather than at the point of entry into the house, or are we talking about a bonding earth cable completely separate to the SWA sheathing here?

thanks Richard

-- Richard Sampson

email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk

Reply to
RichardS

As I understand it, it must be completely separate, not run in the same cable at all. It has to be pretty thick, too. I can't remember exactly, but

10mm rings a bell, and it needs mechanical protection for burying, too. If it gets chopped, it must be relaid end to end, unlike the SWA supply, which can use buried junction boxes.

Christian.

Reply to
Christian McArdle

OK, thanks. Separate local earthing arrangements sound like the best and most straighforward solution all round then.

-- Richard Sampson

email me at richard at olifant d-ot co do-t uk

Reply to
RichardS

Yes - one or the other ;-) You really have to do the earth-loop-impedance calcs to be sure. The "unbroken" requirement, though, does mean that if you can get away with using the steel (note, steel, not copper, so a rather higher resistance) armour as the bonding conductor, the SWA needs to run unbroken to the CU and have its sheath made off directly at your main earthing terminal - possible but messy (weird pigtailing of the sheath, wrapping the wrapped-and-collapsed sheath in green-and-yellow heatshrink, and bringing it through the CU to the main earth terminal). And at the garage end, full adherence to the "unbroken" requirement if you need to cross-bond structural metalwork or water/gas pipes makes it impractical. Hence the more common route is to end up with a hefty separate bonding conductor, likely thicknesses off the top of my head being 10 or 16mmsq, cable-tied to the outside of the SWA, doing the bonding-in-the-outbuilding-thing, "visiting" (looping through) the earthing point in the garage, continuing along the route of the SWA, and then running direct to the PME earthing point. Heavy...

All of which sounds, thank goodness, like it's going to be unnecessary

*for* *your* *particular* *installation* (no generalisations to bottom-of-the-garden brick-built workshops with 63A submains and a water main connection, please!): you've a *wooden* shed, so presumably no fixed metalwork which would need equipotencial bonding; and with a, what, 20A? 30A? breaker in the CU which feeds your 12m of, what, 4mmsq? 6mmsq if you want minimum voltage loss and lower earth-loop-impedance figures, you're likely (but I haven't done the calcs!) to be in good shape to meet the 0.4s disconnection time requirement even without an RCD for the whole shed. (You may find it sensible to use 3-core SWA with its own 4mmsq/6mmsq earth - sorry, circuit protective - conductor, rather'n using the sheath for the main earth; you'd still earth the sheath at the house end, but now you're using the sheath for mechanical protection only. It'd be nicer to keep the shed lights off the 30mA RCD you'll want for the shed sockets; that way you'll still see what the spinning power tool is doing after you slice through its supply cable or whatever ;-).

Hope this helps rather than confusing... Stefek

Reply to
stefek.zaba

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.