GB wrote in news:mfj6qa$kq5$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:
formatting link
/4/lfiprod_ge1_jun13.jpg
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Still grappling with fluorescent light fittings
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
GB wrote in news:mfj6qa$kq5$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Yes, and so successful that people still believe it. In fact it was radar not carrot juice that let our pilots see in the dark.
Robert
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
I fitted one of these in my mothers new kitchen. She was very anti-fluorescent at first as she was remembering fittings from years ago but she instantly approved of this one.
formatting link
Instant light and it's like an operating theatre. Bright, no shadows etc. Not cheap but well worth it. They do it a smaller version and other options.
Peter.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
violates some very basic rules of good design, primarily bare tubes
NT
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
En el artículo , PAJ escribió:
1) Yuck. 2) HOW much?! 3) Yuck.- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
I had seen that design before, and quite like it. It's a tad cheaper at QVS
formatting link
I was put off because I thought it might need an awful lot of cleaning. It's still on the "maybe" list, though.
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
bare tubes cause glare
NT
- Vote on answer
- posted
9 years ago
Also my cousin caused a massive shower of fine glass coated with phosphor and traces of mercury all over six people once when she (clumsily) opened a bottle of champagne without knowing there was a couple of uncovered tubes above them.