indeed they would, And just drop the furniture and run.
indeed they would, And just drop the furniture and run.
In these blocks I suspect the front door is the primary fire exit.
had you noticed that the building concerned is not modern?
In message , at 17:22:48 on Sun, 23 Nov 2014, tim..... remarked:
Does OFT-unfair now equate to "stupid"? I think not.
Umm anything?. Can he keep out firemen?...
>In article , charles scribeth thus
Where do you want to take that Charles, what about when the builders etc are in?...
If they have reason enter, no ...
Yes.
And I don't think your theory has anything to do with it.
I think the buildings and their owners are too posh to have common removal men tramping through the halls.
Think about it - if it was just down to fire risk, then a simple protocol would be far more sensible than this ridiculous idea of loading everything through a balcony window.
I wonder how much of this is to do with security. Some bod turns up with an item of furniture, then proceeds to kick a few doors down. The rich mostly live in fear
Then I conclude that said washing m/c was not made by Miele, because they have cast iron dampers, proper bearings, and weigh a lot. So much in fact, that removal companies, when asked for quotes to move from or into an upper floor flat, generally ask what make of washing machine is being moved.
Andrew
If you can afford to pay £3 million for a flat, then you can afford to engage a professional removal firm, like Pickfords, who will have all the right people and equipment. This looks suspiciously like either a cheap removal job, *OR* (more likely) it is a refurb job and the builders are trying to move furniture around in-situ themselves.
Just pop over to the grundian and look at some of the comments regarding the 'explosion' on a train at Charing Cross.
PS were the two Polish lads actually employed as removal men, or were they part of a building firm doing a refurb and just moving things about ?.
No, it was an (old) Hotpoint. With large lumps of concrete.
actually the technical term is "for which there is no justifiable reason for its inclusion".
AISI there is no justifiable reason for this clause other than a "jobsworth" attitude of the author.
Tim
I've done it with a Hotpoint, but unknown to the onlookers, I had removed the top and bottom lumps of concrete to make it easily liftable.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.