Recomendations for a new barn conversion....

Hi, Thought I would just plug into some of the knowledge in this group..... We are in the process (Only preliminary planning tho) of a barn conversion and was wondering if anyone has any ideas of good technologies/designs to start with, i.e I'm interested in this new boiler which is meant to generate its own elec, and we are looking at installing a reed bed for sewage treatment. But what do you think? Is it worth installing networking cable, speaker cable? etc what would be the best heating UF or normal Rads, bearing in mind its a brick skirt with wooden top, also any ideas on good double glazing as we are having a lot of glass on the front.

Cheers, obviously we are having an architect but thought I would look in to a few of the techs available. Oli

Reply to
The Question Asker
Loading thread data ...

Oli

There is a mailing list just for selfbuilders like you. So, join that.

formatting link
It is called UK_selfbuild

The Stirling engine boilers: One is out about now, the Whispergen

formatting link
and the other, the MicroGen is out next year
formatting link
cable: Yes, however it may be redundant quite quickly as wireless technology takes hold.

Heating? An open question really. If you are having Heat Recovery Ventilation, then go forced air throughout using the same uprated ventilation ducting, heating the ductwork via a copper coil heater battery in the ductwork via a wet boiler. UFH is good for large areas, like churches, as the heat comes from under you. May fit the bill. Insulate the place as much as possible as barns are famous for running away with heating bills. Have a "warm roof" that is superinsulated.

Concentrate on making the fabric air tight, reducing, or eliminating, cold bridges and insulating as much as possible, to superinsulation levels if possible. Go well over any building regs. Then heating may be a partial background system.

Glazing? Go triple low "e".

Good luck.

Reply to
IMM

Reply to
The Question Asker

If you do, install a Klargester Biodisc instead of a standard septic tank. Then you might not even need the reed bed, but you'll be doing the environment some extra good if you do install them. You'll probably get consent to discharge into watercourses with such a set up and only need jetting every 12 months.

Christian.

Reply to
Christian McArdle

Reply to
The Question Asker

A modern properly functioning septic tank will probably need emptying every couple of years. A mini treatment plant will require de-sludging and servicing annually. The advantage is that it will produce a much lower level of pollution than a septic tank. In many cases you will not be permitted to install a septic tank without some form of post treatment. You really need to research the various systems and take account of local ground conditions. It is certainly worth talking to your local building control department or the Environment Agency who should have knowledge of local conditions.

Reply to
Peter Crosland

The 12 months is a recommendation (which stand for septic tanks too, AIUI). It will work without it. It is basically a superior design of septic tank using rotating discs with much better resistance to chemicals. It maintains bacterial action under much harsher conditions. Its discharges are suitable for putting into watercourses even before tertiary treatment by reed beds. I'd recommend taking a look at their website.

formatting link

You may find your building control department insist on one anyway.

Christian.

Reply to
Christian McArdle

I think that you are brave to go for that. Tried and tested menas the trades know how to do it, and teh building isnpector won't hesitate to pass it...but don't let it stop you - just be aware of teh teeth sufking and extra expense..

In my opinion totally 100% yes, and SKADS of it everywhere. You can always leave bits lying in teh walls - termination is expensive, cable is cheap, especially before you line it.

Underfloor if you can get it into the screed, especially with all that glass. No matter how good the DG is, its always colder than your lovely insulated walls are going to be, and air will still cool against the glass and drift down to bare foot level. Having a warm floor will transform the feel.

Upstairs its not so easy a cvhoice. UF is more difficult to install in he upper floors, espceailly if you have a celing less than an inch thick as I do (exposed beams)And you will want hot towel rails i teh bathrooms etc, and prtobaly a nice warm cupbioard to air clothes in - so those will be more conventional rads/rails etc.

I have UF heating in a corridoor downstairs leading to a stairwell - and it has proved to be uneccesary to gheat the landing at all. Plenty of heat rises to teh upper levels, so if ou have a mezzanine gallery type construction, you may not need to heat it upstairs at all - just double up on teh UF at ground floor lelevl.

Never used the stuff. I believe triple galzed is teh best, and argon filled. Its still cold relative to walls. We single glazed our much smaller windows, and with thermally lined curtains and proper draught sealing, they don't lose as much heat as a no curtain DG unit would.

G'luck mate!

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Been using our biodisc for two years now. Haven't touched it. No smell at all. Probably a bit better than a reed bed, but does the same job.

I am running roof rainwater via a separate private sewer into the pond. If you decide to do the same (recommended) get the pipework in early..its makes a blasted mess of the lawns.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

If it is approved the BCO can suck his teeth out, he has to pass it. far too many of these goons force their own opioions on peopel, like having cavity walls. The MicroGen is not technology that is not understood. The electricity producing Stirling unit is hermetically sealed, like a fridge compressor, the rest is common technology. They would mainly be using off-the-shelf components anyhow.

If having a heat recovery & vent unit (recommended as the hosue always has a nice fesh feel and smell to it), then forced air to boost it along.

Reply to
IMM

They do these days unless your soil is very absorbent.

I must say mine has been faultless.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

The BCO can do what he likes, and your only recourse is a long and expensive appeal.

I had tio get a not overly expensive complete heat loss calculation done on teh house before I was allowed to use e.g. single glazed windows. Without that the inspectir would not have been able to determine that the whole house met energy conservation requirements.

My heating system is 'interesting' to say the least. The plumber just didn't believe it would work. It does.

None of these are insuperable problems, but they are all issues that have to be dealt with, and take extra time and money because of it.

As far as your comments like 'XXX is understood technology' goes, that is a very por statement. Understood by WHOM. You? The scientific community? The BCO? The plumber?

My plumber didn't even understand pressure.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

There are piles of jobs that are best to do when you have an empty shell, don't skimp on fitting cables, or plumbing, drains it will be MUCH more work later.

I used a package sewage treatment unit, very good, very easy to install, no problems to run.

UF heating or rads, I would do UF, for one reason "no rads", but I would not put UF into a wooden floor (upstairs).

I am slowly DIY'ing a barn conversion, with experts when I need them. I am spending extra to get top quality on the bits that are going to be there for 50-

100 years (or more). If I screw up someting fundamentsl its going to cost so much to repair. If I have a cheep carpet, repair is only the cost of a new carpet.

I would suggest you spend a good ammout of time on getting the design / layout right, the last thing you want is to get to the end and wish the rooms where in different places.

Rick

Reply to
Rick Dipper

As long as its within the building regulations. If he rejects something out of pure opinion, because he is not familiar with it, then he can be in big trouble. Some people have gone ahead, with independent surveyors reports and photo evidence, and it did not cost them a lot. You can always go over his head if he is uncooperative and supply the details.

Sensible.

Heath Robinson eh.

If the appliance is CE approved, etc, no one can stop you installing it. Certainly no BCO who lives in the 1950s.

You mean the man who pretended to be a plumber.

Reply to
IMM

This is true. You can install extra pipes and cable and just leave them terminated for future use. Extra drains is a good idea, as putting these in later is real expensive pain.

Reply to
IMM

No, his name was 'dave' I believe.

Ah, it WAS you wasn't it?

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 17:37:54 -0000, a particular chimpanzee named "Christian McArdle" randomly hit the keyboard and produced:

Not Building Control per se, but IIRC the Environment Agency would require a treatment plant (as opposed to a septic tank) if you were discharging within 500m of a borehole or reservoir.

Reply to
Hugo Nebula

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.