Re: B&Q Bans overcharged customer

A Wigan pensioner has been banned from every B&Q store in Britain

> after complaining about being overcharged. > > Ronald Helsby was given a refund after being charged £45 too much for > wood but was overcharged by £1.50 the next time. > > The 67-year-old ex-builder said: "All I did was to ask the boy on the > till if his knickers were tight because he was going on and on like my > old lady." > > -- > Fred

With insulting behaviour like that, he deserved to be banned. Regards Mike.

Reply to
Mike Cawood, HND BIT
Loading thread data ...

Someone tries to steal from you and you're supposed to be polite to them?

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

No, he did not. He was wrong for being rude, sure, but he could apologise and let that be an end to it. For B&Q to ban him from EVERY store is so over the top it beggars belief. This is political correctness/jobsworthyism gone completely round the twist. In any case, can't we pass any fairly innocuous remark nowadays without someone calling in the Gestapo? The remark he made sounds merely sarcastic. Hardly what I'd call being rude the way true yobs can be with their effing and blinding.

MM

Reply to
MM

How can you say that, do you know any more about this case than what has been posted here or published in the media, if you don't how do you know what was said by whom and why ?

There is being sarcastic or even rude about a company or store and there is being 'personally' insulting to someone (who can't do anything about the matter even if he wanted to) is another IMO.

Reply to
:::Jerry::::

Oh piss off

Reply to
Tone

I wonder if they have sent his photograph to all the other stores?

Reply to
Hiram Hackenbacker

I give up! It's pointless.

MM

Reply to
MM

Maybe. But it's the principle of the thing. Such Draconian treatment is the equivalent of B&Q applying its own form of ASBO across the entire country. I just think it's excessive, that's all. Now, if the Old Gentleman had gone there with a machine gun and taken out all the staff, then they might well have a case...

MM

Reply to
MM

If I were his wife, I'd ban him too.

Reply to
Kate Dicey

You get a much better class of apology if you manage to be seriously insulting without resorting to calling the oiks at the cash till silly names. A nicely (in the old fashioned sense) worded letter to the company directors usually prods the minions into action.

Reply to
Kate Dicey

If you read my earlier post about complaining to a garage, their parent company and the car maker, I'm not so sure. It will depend on how much they value their reputation. Garages seem to believe they have every right to rip off their customers.

Never had a problem with B&Q.

Bought a flat pack filing cabinet from Homebase (in the Sainsbury days) and then decided I wanted a second matching one. But it was now discontinued. Found a display one which I bought but found missing some bits that would be hard to replace. The branch offered a refund, but no help in getting the missing parts. Wrote to head office and got a complete hardware pack for one by return and free of charge. That was excellent service as I'd paid well under the list price for the ex display one which was otherwise fine.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

- alternatively -

Someone makes a genuine error and you're supposed to be polite to them?

"Yes" IMHO

Reply to
Lobster

It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "Mike Cawood, HND BIT" saying something like:

Any more old women coming out, then?

Reply to
Grimly Curmudgeon

I read it as two lots of overcharging one after another. Genuine error might be stretching it somewhat. But then we don't have the full story.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

"MM" wrote | >> The 67-year-old ex-builder said: "All I did was to ask the | >> boy on the till if his knickers were tight because he was | >> going on and on like my old lady." | >With insulting behaviour like that, he deserved to be banned. | >Regards Mike. | No, he did not. He was wrong for being rude, sure, but he could | apologise and let that be an end to it. For B&Q to ban him from | EVERY store is so over the top it beggars belief. This is political | correctness/jobsworthyism gone completely round the twist.

Looking at it from an employer's perspective, many employers now have policies of zero tolerance of "abuse" of their staff. They have a Health And Safety obligation to protect their employees from Stress and if they did otherwise would probably find themselves on the wrong end of a sick pay and compensation claim from the employee, especially if there was a repeat incident from this member of the public.

Owain

Reply to
Owain

So your theory is two wrongs make a right?

d
Reply to
distant

No. A natural gut reaction to what might well have been a deliberate act.

Or perhaps you're perfect?

Perhaps I'm one in a million, but I could count on the fingers of one hand the number of times I've been undercharged or given too much change. The other? No idea, it's been so often.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

It's no different to his, hers, theirs, yours. None have an apostrophe in them.

Indeed:-)

Reply to
MikeT

[random crossposting neutered]

Good for you!

The day I come back here and everything is being written thus:

I h8 splnpls u ned y pls txt me 4 advc

or

J00 G4Y 5Y5T3M 5UXX0R5, MY 1334 C0MB1 5KI11Z 0WN5 J00 455!!!!

is the day I shoot myself.

Timbo

Reply to
Tim S

In message , Tim S writes

A few have tried ... they haven't lasted long

(writing, not shooting, that is)

Reply to
raden

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.