Re: ???? ???:(??????? ????????? ??????? ?????? ??? ?????????)??????? – ??????? ??? ??????? ???? ?????? ?? 11-15/11/2012?

[Chris Hogg]

????? wrote:

>> ????????? ??????? ???? ????? >> >> ?????? ????? ????? ???? ?????????? >> ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ?? ???? ??????? ????? ???: >> ???????: ????? ??? ??? >> ???????? ?? : ???? ?????? ????????? ???????? ?????????? ? ???? ??????? ? ????? ??? ??? >> ??? ??? ??? ???? ???: >> (??????? ????????? ??????? ?????? ??? ?????????) >> ??????? ? ??????? ??? ??????? ???? ?????? ?? 11-15/11/2012? >> ???? ????? ????????? ??? ??????? ????????? ??????? ?????? ??? ????????? ???

?? ??????? ???? ???? ????????? ????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????? ????? ?????????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???: ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ?????????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ???????????? ???? ????????? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ???? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ??? ?????? ??? ?????????

??????????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ????? ???????? ??? ??????

???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ??????? ???????? ???????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ??? ??? ????????? ???????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?? ????????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ??????? ????? ??? ????????? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ??? ????????.

> ???????? ?? ??? ???? ???????? ????? ??? ????????? ????????? ????????? ?????

???????? ???????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ??????????? ??? ?? ???.

> ????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ??? ???????? ?????? ????

????? ???????? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ???? ???????? 1000 ????? ?????? .

> ?? ???? ??????? ????????? ??? >> >> >> ????? ?? ????????? ????? ??????? >> ???? ???? ??????? >> ?/ ???? ?????? >> ????: 00201002958200 >> ????: 0020235866963 ? 0020235860262?? 0020235860290 >> ????: 0020235830285?? 0020235866953?? 0020235849316 >> ???? ???????? : [e-mail] >> >> >> >> >> >My thoughts exactly...not?

Oh, I don't know; I always question everything.

[The Natural Philosopher]

?? ??????? ???? ???? ????????? ????????? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ??????????? ????? ?????????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ????? ???: ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ?????????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ??????? ???????????? ???? ????????? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ???? ??????? ?? ????????? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ??? ?????? ??? ?????????

???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ???? ??????? ???????? ???????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ??? ??? ????????? ???????? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ??? ????????? ?????? ??? ??????? ??? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ??????? ?? ????????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ??????? ????? ??? ????????? ????????? ??? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ??? ????????.

???????? ???????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ??????????? ??? ?? ???.

????? ???????? ??? ??????? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ???? ???????? 1000 ????? ?????? .

I THINK your fonts are not as comprehensive as mine are :-)

I was erasrching something about eraly Buddhism and hindu culture and wiki had lots of stuff that was written in hindi, so I downloaded all the stock middle eastern and Asian fonts and now I get perefectly (incomprehensible) arabic . I've even got runes ...somewhere..

[polygonum]

Using vanilla W7 (no extra fonts installed) I saw whatever language that was - apparently properly. It was the response which converted them all to question marks. I guess that would be true for most people using recent versions of operating systems?????

[The Natural Philosopher]

No but it would be true of anyone using googleshite.

[Chris Hogg]

I think you're right!

[djc]

...

My stock Xubuntu has all the fonts by default.

[The Natural Philosopher]

ALL ?? I doubt it.

>

[Andy Burns]

TB on Win7 rendered the original fine, and your reply to it, but Chris's and Brian's newsreaders managed to f*ck-up the charset in different ways when they replied ...

[The Natural Philosopher]

Garble Groups.....

[Andy Champ]

I saw Arabic. Google tells me its a conference in Cairo on IT security.

Andy