House with downstairs bathroom, cold and hot water (from central heating) tanks
are on ground floor.
Wanting to add an upstairs en-suite bathroom, the problem is how to get hot
One solution would be to move the HW tank upstairs (presumably this could be fed
from mains), but
this entails lots of plumbing of central-heating feed to it.
Can you buy a pump/pressure switch type system that automatically turns on when
the upstairs hot tap
is opened to pump the hot water up....
I'm envisaging something like a pump (with non-return valve), and maybe a small
'air reservoir' type
arrangement (as used on sealed CH systems) to make the volume/pressure behaviour
'softer', so the
pump maintains a positive pressure in the pipe/resevrvoir, and the pressure drop
when the tap is
opened turns the pump on, and the rise created by the pump acting against the
closed tap turns it
off. I'd guess adjustment may be tricky to stop it oscillating on/off....
Anyone know of a system to do this...
Err, you don't have to move the hotwater cylinder, just the header tank
for the hot water system. So you don't have to rearrange the supply tot
he hot water cylinder, indeed you don't have to move the HW cylinder at
all. Just make sure that either (a) the cold water tank is higher than
the taps in the bathroom or (b) that you have a sealed (mains pressure)
I've now had a look at the system, figured out how it works, and come to the
same conclusion, i.e.
move the cold water tank to the loft. However there is a problem - the access to
the loft is only
So does anyone know anyone who makes something like a collapsible water tank -
mabe made of floppy
polythene that is made rigid by a frame....??
Or do I have to connect lots of little tanks together..?
...and how do you determine how big the cold tank needs to be - instinct tells
me it should be
bigger than the hot water cylinder, but I suppose it depends how fast it
Don't write off the mains pressure systems. You may actually find it less
work (or cheaper if paying someone) to install a mains pressure hot water
cylinder of some sort and not bother sticking anything in the loft. Either a
mains pressure unvented cylinder or some form of heat bank would achieve
this. Purchase costs are about 600+VAT for either, plus fitting. However, if
your mains water supply is good enough, these will be vastly superior to a
gravity fed system. If your hot water cylinder is old, it might need
replacing soon anyway.
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:24:32 +0100, "Christian McArdle"
visit the Library later
I vaguely remember reading somewhere that pressurised HW systems now come under
building regs and
must be installed by a registered plumber.
This is a DIY and 'do it cheaply' job to turn a room that's too small to call a
3rd bedroom into an
ensuite bathroom to improve value for selling the house next year.
In fact they all come under Building Regulations now.
For pressurised cylinders installation the issue is safety and is
covered by part G.
For all cylinders, conservation of energy applies and is covered by
If you use contractors who are members of the appropriate
organisations (e.g. IoP), then they can self certify and issue a
Alternatively you can submit a building notice.
Especially considering that you are selling the house, it would be
prudent to do things by the book and do the necessary applications if
you plan to DIY.
As a side note, are you sure that reducing the number of rooms will
improve the value? You may think that a room is too small to be
called a bedroom but the standards for the minimum size of a bedroom,
especially for a child, are for quite surprisingly small. Creating a
two bedroomed house (albeit with an en-suite may result in a lower
value than a three bedroomed house or make it difficult to sell.
I would contact a couple of local estate agents and get a view from
To email, substitute .nospam with .gl
But presumably there is no building regs requirement if all I do is move the
cold tank to the loft,
not touching the hot system except to raise the vent pipe to the level of the
cold tank and take a
feed off for the new bathroom.
This was the advice of an estate agent.
As well as being small and a silly shape, the third room is only accessible off
I think you are right.
However, building regulations approval for replacing a cylinder will be very
cheap and simple. It only relates to certifying that there is sufficient
insulation on the cylinder (it will have a "Part L" certificate on the side)
and that there is a cylinder thermostat capable of turning off the boiler
when it is fully heated. It is nothing to be scared of and doesn't require a
certified person to install.
The building control officers are usually very nice people and, quite
frankly, won't really care about what you do, as they are far more
interested in telling people how far to dig their foundations, or to replace
their joists with ones half an inch wider.
That will probably make it worthwhile. No-one likes a 2+1, at least no-one
actually looking for a 3 bed. Reminds me of one house I looked at which was
described as a 3 bed, but one room just consisted of what could be described
as a particularly wide corridor upstairs. I wouldn't have even described it
as a 2+1. Certainly no scope even as an en-suite.
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:06:38 +0100, "Christian McArdle"
Thanks for the info - as this is a 'minimum cost' install, and the present GCH
system is on the old
side, and seems to be somewhat confusingly set up, I think the option of
changing as little as
possible and just moving the cold tank to the loft will be the cheapest and
easiest (even if we have
to hack out a bigger loft hatch or connect several small CW tanks!), It also
frees up some
potentially useable space under the stairs (where the CW tank is now), and would
allow a bigger HW
tank to be installed in the future (to allow 2 baths to be run off 1 tank!) if
..but there is also the issue of building permission application fees - I think
it's well over 100
quid in the borough concerned (Walthem Forest) - not sure if this applies to all
types of work, but
was certainly the case when we were investigating DIYing window replacement.
This is problem now that building regulations are extending into relatively
trivial areas. A year or so ago the cost of building regulations approval
for replacing a cylinder here was about 190 pounds - the same as employing
someone to do the complete job!! (The fees were on a sliding scale - and
that represented the minimum fee).
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com ).
"Christian McArdle" wrote
| >So what happens if one has a gravity fed HW system?
| They are basically banned. (Assuming you mean gravity circulated
| indirect heating).
So what does one do in the case of solid fuel boilers which can't be shut
Solid fuel boilers are exempt.
i.e. it says
| Timing systems would be inappropriate for systems with solid fuel
| boilers which operate only by natural draught.
The requirement for a hot water cylinder thermostat to operate a boiler
interlock comes under a paragraph refering only to gas and oil systems.
| Gas and oil fired hot water central heating system controls should
| switch the boiler off when no heat is required whether control is by
| room thermostats or by thermostatic radiator valves:
| a) The boiler in systems controlled by thermostats should operate
| only when a space heating or vessel thermostat is calling for heat.
As far as pumped primary circuits are concerned, it indicates using pumped
primaries as a method of complying for the requirement to reduce primary
circuit losses. However, it isn't an absolute requirement. I suspect you
would need to lag the primary circuit to reduce losses if the pipes will
remain hot for long periods. That might have difficulty establishing gravity
flow, though, as it might affect the thermal characteristics of the circuit.
I don't know how this rule would be interpreted in practice.
"Christian McArdle" wrote
| >So what does one do in the case of solid fuel boilers which can't be
| >shut down totally?
| Solid fuel boilers are exempt.
Ah. I wondered if the Gov'ment had banned those too, to encourage solid fuel
users to convert to storage heaters installed by NICEIC members.
Sorry, I was only talking about oil and gas fired heating systems. With
solid fuel, it appears that almost anything goes, although if the boiler has
a fanned ventilation system, this should be timed and thermostated like oil
You also have to show that you are limiting primary circuit losses. It
indicates that the preferred method is to used a pumped primary circuit with
a reasonably rapid recovery coil and thermostatic control, so the pipes
don't stay hot for long. With a gravity system, you would have to show an
alternative method for reducing primary losses, as the heat transfer will be
much slower and the pipes will stay hot and, thus, be inefficient.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.