OT. Windows 8 nearly drove me insane

Yeah, come to Linux and get similar crap but for free.

Reply to
Cursitor Doom
Loading thread data ...

I feel your pain. Seems there's no easy way to cut oneself off from MS dependency without a world of aggro from the inadequate alternatives. :(

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

formatting link

Reply to
Huge

I'm f*cking speechless, Huge. I thought Jobs had masterminded his own unique OS for the Ipad and whatnot from scratch! Never would have believed BSD underlied it in a million years. SMFH in disbelief!

Reply to
Cursitor Doom

I am, yet again, in the throes of trying to get Linux (Mint 16) to work with the best hardware I can afford to record sound and video and use my bluetooth linked phone as a 3G modem.

All "just work" under Windows with the appropriate drivers. None are cutting edge items, and all work well with any version of Windows from XP to 7. The reason I've tried Linux is because I want to avoid Windows

8, in the same way and for similar reasons as I dodged ME and Vista.

I will shortly be removing Linux once more and restoring the boot sector of the HD, and possibly replacing the XP with Windows 7, pending Windows 9.

On the other hand, if I were just surfing the 'net and doing normal office work and e-mails, I'd probably get away with using Linux. I know this, because all the programs I use for this are open Source ones that have been ported from Linux.

Reply to
John Williamson

OS X is certainly BSD. I don't know and con't care about ios.

Reply to
Tim Streater

I WAS thinking of OS-X..let's look at IOS instead.. YUp. Based on Darwin same as OS-X

formatting link

So every I-BolloxThing is running at core level BSD UNIX.

Not sure wjherte you got te idea that BSD unix is poor on relaibilitrytho.

Praps you have better tell apple..

Linux ruins under as well as being te base of all linux desktop distros.

BSD runs under ALL apple bling. Largely IIRC for commercial reasons.

Only Microsoft has its own abortion that isn't *nix derived.

Its what runs on top that is more obvious though.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

:-)

There is a grain of truth in that.

Conversation with mate who sold me old acer laptop

"I sold it to you because it wouldn't run anything but XP"

"well I got it as far ans Mint 14 before I ran into hardware compatibility issues, and that's better than XP!"

"You done all right then".

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

What? its common knowledge that OSX and IOS are Unix with a pretty face., Why reinvent the wheel?

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

IIUC OS X is based on the work done at NeXT while jobs was out of the apple frame.

Reply to
John Rumm

One might argue its VMS derived...

Reply to
John Rumm

Wasn't that the NT flavour courtesy of Dave Cutler? Even then he had to be ordered to graft the drive letter shit on top of something that was otherwise not bad, AIUI.

Reply to
Tim Streater

What was the problem? Win8 isn't much different to win7. Its quite different to XP.

You can make it very similar to either by installing classic shell but there isn't any real problems without it.

Just bought one of those medion netbooks from asda with win 8 on for the wife and I won't be putting classic shell on it (looks pretty good for the money £169 on the web but I only paid £150).

Reply to
dennis

I recently updated mine and it was 880 Mbytes. I don't know why you would need 3600 Mbytes.

Reply to
dennis

That sounds like the size of the recent 8.1 to 8.1U1 update, not the 8 to 8.1 update.

Reply to
Andy Burns

That's what firewalls are for. You may have one in your router.

Reply to
dennis

I think you are right - though I didn't take much notice of the 8.1U1 size.

Reply to
polygonum

Microsofts history is having to make each new prince backwards compatible with a royal abortion that should have been laid to rest in around 1993.

They had the chance then with Xenix and a share in SCO to actually create an OS that worked. They muffed it. Well on fact they didnt, they created the whole PC-UNIX thing that lead in the end to Linux!

Every time -the same thing happened with OS/2 - they could have done an OS-X and jumped from msdos to a better foundation they chickened out and NT was severely compromised by being dOSSIFIED.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

and Xubuntu is the best of all, why it is less popular then all the other buntu?s is a mystery to me.

-
Reply to
Mark

Not forgetting the NAS4Free developers and their user base too.

Reply to
Johny B Good

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.