There's one being completed a few miles from us, a mile or so SE of Hayle in West Cornwall. It's roughly at the junction of Wheal Alfred Road and Drannack Mill Lane, Google Maps 50.177, -5.388. A south-facing slope, perfectly good farmland AFAIK. Google Maps shows the field being harvested for hay, with no sign yet of the solar panels.
Simply untrue. Unless you are suggesting that the local planning authority has taken a bribe. In any case it is not particularly good farm land being classified as grade 3 and the complete installation has to be removed after 25 years and the site restored to the original state.
" we could oppose tescos development, but they would take it to appeal, get a load pof laweyers in, cost te local taxpayer a firtune, and porobab;y win, because we cant afford the lawyers theyand experts they can. Omn the orther hand, they have promised to ugraded teh road to that area so that saves us money"
"the word has come down from CPHQ that we have to let the windmills get built, so the whip is out: you will pass this ill advised application nod sagely at the outrageous and false claims made for its justification, if you want to have any hope of staying in the consrevative party, and theres a nice little sinecure as chairman of the local renewable energy committee for you if you do."
Hell Tim yeo even admitted it.
In any case it is not particularly good
manambly at taxpayer expense since the company hwo built it will long have vansihed by then.
Nothing like trimming posts to f*ck up context. FYI, my contribution to this thread was the sarcastic: Obviously more profitable milking the population...
I accept your apology in advance to save you trimming and screwing up context again.
You really should not lead with your chin. Your poor command of English is only exceeded by your inability construct a logical argument to support your point of view. A classic case of not doing some trivially easy research to see if your argument had any merit.
The point the previous poster was unsuccessfully trying to make was that there was a complete prohibition on using agricultural land which of course there is not. The other point that is often missed is that the permissions are conditional on the land being returned to the orginal use after a period of time usually 25 years by which time the panels will be at the end of the useful life. Of course it might htne be subject to another application to install whatever technology is then available, but this is not a foregone conclusion.
The thought has crossed my mind for here. I have South facing *hot* land and a conveniently placed 11kV distributor feed. However, there are also lots of well used public rights of way and, at less than a mile from the centre of a large village, lots of small boys:-)
There is the opprobrium of joining Harry to consider as well. I think I'll just go on taking the CAP payments to pad out my pension:-)
Nothing to do with humour when all you can come up with is offensive language. Resorting to insults just proves the point that you have no rationl argument.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.