Don't be silly. If it was doomed then it was doomed. It's just cheaper to mine if you have 100ft thick seam starting at the surface, or whatever the Strines have.
Don't be silly. If it was doomed then it was doomed. It's just cheaper to mine if you have 100ft thick seam starting at the surface, or whatever the Strines have.
No need for that.
Colombian coal doesn't come from Australia, but as you say, it is certainly cheaper to mine.
Cheers
I'm thinking of whatever the engines use, if that was specified, I don't remember it.
Yep. That industry would not have imploded as spectacularly without him.
It was in fact bought much cheaper from places like Australia which had much better pay and conditions than they had.
It didn?t come from Columbia at the time being discussed.
En el artículo , Hank escribió:
... yet another Woddles morph.
And yet Australia exports coal to China and the UK (the latter is a minority importer to be fair - most is Russian and Colombian).
But an Australian dumper driver (200-250 tonne dumper) gets somethign like £50k / pa salary. Not at all bad. So it is possible to be a miner in a civilised country for decent pay.
The one I saw was more like 12' about 50' down. But yes, much easier.
Another mad Russian theory. These are the ones that predicted that "used up" oil wells would refill from some source in the centre of the EArth.
The Russians will say anything to continue to sell gas.
They "quarry" it, not mine it. At a tenth of the price of a deep mine. Which is why they can send it halfway round the world and still be cheaper.
Much safer and lower technology too.
Used up wells are just ones where the rate of production is too low to bother, they will "fill up" again if you stop extracting from them.
Harry will say anything as long as its wrong.
Do you still claim to get all your electricity from solar because that's wrong too.
One based upon science that, unlike any models based upon the CO2 hypothesis, has, so far, fairly accurately predicted global temperatures in the 21st century.
Well, you would. Principle is something very foreign to you.
With all the talk of 'holding the country to ransom' you'd have thought miners earned more than MPs. Or at least more than any other manual workers - before you took into account the danger and unpleasant working conditions.
Whatever his Union decided was appropriate.
Or do you want the earning of everyone controlled by the state?
Those who thought they'd do better by toadying to Thatcher soon found they weren't.
And just how much longer?
More rubbish. Where have you been for the last 40 years?
Or the government saw it as a way to take on all unions. The result being the vast number these days on very low wages. Which is exactly what many people wanted. But not if they were to be on those low wages, of course.
And those that weren't in 'his' union still have nice secure jobs? Which planet is that on, Dennis?
That is vert much like,letting the govenement decide on what salerty they are worth and we can see what happens then.
I always thought it wrong that Scargill got a full wage during the strike, I thought his salery came from minors not the government.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.