[OT] Face value of stamps and the costs of posting

That sounds like a pretty good deal - I can't see any others on Ebay so they must be really, really rare.

Owain

Reply to
Owain
Loading thread data ...

Definitely a.

Reply to
Spider

The use of such a system is quite independent of computers, their infallibility (or otherwise), and what people think about them.

Reply to
Frederick Williams

Good thinking batman!

50 (say) = 110010 = thruppence-worth of stamps (presumably the 0p stamps are free)

but 7 = 111 also = thruppence-worth of stamps.

So are you saying that both 50p and 7p postage should actually cost 3p?

Reply to
Frederick Williams

In message , at 12:50:07 on Wed, 7 Jun

2006, Mark Robinson remarked:

Farty *little* lorries? Ever driven up the M1 late in the evening? It's not quite nose to tail with PO Juggernaughts, but they make up a significant proportion of the traffic.

Reply to
Roland Perry

Mary, and possibly others on uk.people.silversurfers, are probably still living in the era of the Night Mail crossing the border, Bringing the cheque and the postal order, Letters for the rich, letters for the poor, The shop at the corner and the girl next door. Pulling up Beattock, a steady climb: The gradient's against her, but she's on time. Past cotton-grass and moorland boulder Shovelling white steam over her shoulder, Snorting noisily as she passes Silent miles of wind-bent grasses. (Wystan Hugh Auden)

Owain

Reply to
Owain

In my scheme what is minimized is the number of stamp denominations rather than the number of stamps on an envelope.

Reply to
Frederick Williams

In what way is it minimised? You can clearly make all denominations with a single (1p) denomination. And any base other than two would have fewer denominations for a given maximum amount.

-- Richard

Reply to
Richard Tobin

You'd have to have stamps incorporating place value, so a 7p stamp would be made up of 1, 10 and 100 stamps stuck one on top of the other and right-aligned, and under the new system would cost £1.11

For 50p you'd need 10, 10000 and 100000 stamps, and under the same scheme would cost £1,100.10.

Owain

Reply to
Owain

It's all relative, they are farty little lorries compared to a 325, furkin big juggernauts (ooh missis!) compared to my Laguna.

Reply to
Graeme Wall

Pah! If I've paid for a stamp, I want the PO to deliver it, not some bloody courier.

Reply to
JAF

Roland Perry wrote: [...]

Because the cost is mostly unaffected by distance travelled. The main costs are sorting and delivery.

Reply to
Peter Corlett

I would have said delivery as a cost was closely driven by distance.

Reply to
Bob Mannix

I didn't mention railways ... - and I'm definitely not subscribed to silver surfers :-)

In fact I've only just realised that this is cross-posted!

Better get back under the stone

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher

Me too.

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher

You don't understand typesetting.

Reply to
Mary Fisher

I'd never thought of that!

Spot on, thanks.

Mary

Reply to
Mary Fisher
  • Vote on answer
  • posted

Well I'm in SilverSurfers Mary and since yesterday around 11-15 yesterday thaere have been 133 of posts on this topic crossposted into Silversurfers. I foundthe first few informative - but after that well !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

Reply to
Flyiñg Ñuñ 2°°6 +

Thanks for the reminder of why I never read s'surfers.

Reply to
JAF

You don't understand my odd (strange, weird, abg irel shaal fbzrgvzrf sense of humour.

Reply to
JAF

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.