OT: Engine Firing Order etc.

Other way round? Vincent twins have two cylinders per throw. Hence the lovely exhaust sound!

Reply to
newshound
Loading thread data ...

In article , Cursitor Doom writes

I suspect it might offer more protection in a collision than the original tin can on wheels.

Reply to
bert

Another issue with the original (which I still prefer) was the sharp outside seams!

Reply to
Bob Eager

The Yanks used a radial engine in some Sherman tanks.

Reply to
harry

And both of mine sound lovely. ;-)

It's funny, being an engineering (rather than 'arty') type you would have thought I would have considered the Yamaha 900 Diversion I borrowed for a week (when my R100RT ate it's clutch splines) to be the_ideal_solution. Everything worked perfectly and smoothly (even on this high mileage model), it pulled like a train, was well planted and nearly indestructible ... but I only rode it twice in the week I had it because it had no 'character'.

It turns out that in spite of it being the least reliable bike I have ever owned, there was something about the old Airheads that really floated my boat.

Now, if I was unfortunate enough to need to commute any distance on a bike, I don't think I'd choose the Airhead (but not sure what else I would use).

For local / traffic stuff it could be my other twin, the CB250 Nighthawk. ;-)

Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

My Messerschmitt KR200 has two sets of points but because it's a 2/, the points are for forward and reverse. ;-)

formatting link

Did I read right in that some cars (that do the stop-start thing) use the starter motor for the initial start of the day and then the generator / dynamo(?) for all starts after that?

Again, not a new idea as the 'Dynastart' on the Messerschmitt was both a starter motor and dynamo. ;-)

formatting link

Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

They put radial (not rotary) aircraft engines in Sherman tanks.

Andy

Reply to
Vir Campestris

AIUI there are two types of 5 - one with a crank every 72 degrees, and one that looks like a flat crank 4 almost - except that the 5 are off to one side of the plane slightly, and the centre piston is just over 90 degrees from any other.

But I don't have any good references, so I haven't fixed that article.

There are definitely two types of V8 - flat plane and crossfire. The flat plane has a 4 cylinder's crankshaft, but with a piston for each ban on each big end. The crossfire looks like a cross from the end, with a crank every 90 degrees.

I want an inline 6. I've done the arithmetic, and they balance everything.

Or a RR Merlin :)

Andy

Reply to
Vir Campestris

As I said before, the angle of the V also influences firing intervals. Most V8s have a single crank throw shared between cylinders - 1&2, etc. The most common angle is 90 degrees which gives irregular firing intervals

- hence the V8 'beat' A 60 degree gives even intervals. Or a 90 degree with a flat plane crank.

Yes - although the longer crank can cause problems of its own.

A good engine in its day - but things have rather moved on since then. ;-) Even in supercharged form and with very high octane petrol, never achieved

100 bhp/litre.
Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

I had a bad wallop in a Mini back in 1974 spilt every bloody seam on the body!

After seeing that and surviving it, no more Minis ever since!

Reply to
tony sayer

Just about every engine uses 1-3-4-2; this is one of only two firing orders possible with a conventional in-line UDDU crankshaft:

--| |-- |--|--|

The other is 1-2-4-3, which only Ford use nowadays.

Reply to
Halmyre

1234 1342 1423 1324 1432

these are all possibles.

Because UDDU is not the only crankshaft you can make

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

That's why I said 'conventional'.

Reply to
Halmyre

What other types of crankshaft have been used in 4-cylinder engines. Has anyone made a crankshaft with every cylinder rotated 90 degrees with respect to its neighbour?

If UDDU is 0, 180, 180, 0 degrees with respect to the first cylinder, has anyone used 0, 90, 180, 270 or any other similar variant? Or are all practical crankshafts made with only 0 and 180 bearings (in some order), and no 90 or 270?

As a matter of interest, for a UDDU crankshaft, is there any advantage of

1342 over 1243, given that both have one pair of consecutive cylinders (34 in the first case, 12 in the second). I realise why 1234 is the worst possible firing order, because of creating standing waves.

How does the smoothness of a V engine vary according to the angle of V? An inline is one extreme and a flat-4 boxer is the other extreme (effectively a

180 degree V) but between those extremes, is there any advantage of one V angle versus another, other than that the flatter the V the lower the engine height (but the wider the engine).
Reply to
NY

Yes, see

formatting link

I would hazard a guess that when you've got an engine with a lump of gearbox at one end, 1342 is smoother than 1243 (1 being the front of the engine). although that doesn't explain why Ford used 1243.

Reply to
Halmyre

There are two sorts of "flat" engine, "boxer" and non-boxer. The boxer engine has four crank pins and the pistons on opposite cylinder move away and towards the crank together. They are very vibration free.

formatting link

The non-boxer engine only has two crank pins and are more unbalanced.

Crankshafts are made "flat" because anything elese can't be forged in a single operation.

Reply to
harry

The non-boxer flat is just a 180 degree V. However, that makes me think - what if you were to bend a boxer engine to 90 degrees or whatever? I'm trying to picture the shape of the crank but it's too much for a Sunday morning.

Reply to
Halmyre

I'd forgotten about the non-boxer inline engines. Yes I can imagine that they will vibrate a lot more.

My dad had a Citroen GS with a flat-four engine. It was very smooth (so it was probably a boxer) but then it needed to be because the engine was only

1200 cc and had to rev very fast to get any power. I can remember it was normal to see about 4000-4500 rpm on a motorway in third (he went for the C-Matic transmission which was a three-speed automatic with torque converter, but the gear-changes were made manually with a conventional gear lever rather than automatically. It was weird to change gear without having a clutch.

Yes, a 3D crankshaft, with one crank bearing sticking up from the plane and one sticking down, would be more difficult (impossible?) to mould and to cast.

Reply to
NY

Do V engines normally share crank pins (one piston from each side of the V) rather than having a separate one for each piston as in inline or boxer? Didn't know that.

Reply to
NY

It's common on V8s. Hence the angle of the V determining the firing intervals. It's why the most common - 90 degree - burble. The firing intervals aren't regular. Which also makes it tricky to fit four carbs.

Reply to
Dave Plowman (News)

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.