In any case, a CCTV monitor is way too low spec for DVD's. If a monitor is required, a PC monitor will be very much better, cheaper, and nowadays likely to come with an input to take a signal directly from the DVD player.
I have a knife. It can be used to gut you like a trout. This does not mean I need to install anti-Gutting-Jerry-Like-A-Trout guards on the knife.
The law is perfectly happy with me simply refraining from the act.
Jerry, you are perfectly right about the initial question - please accept my apologies. The subject did move onto CCTV and I thought as I know a bit about it, I'd put in my pennys worth. To me, the company name would show credibility to the post - but I cannot see how it would be considered spamming. However, as this is my third post ever here, please understand this is a learning process for me! I am more than happy to share my experience in the CCTV world with anyone, including installation, data protection, licencing & TV's used in systems, etc but would like the accreditation all the same!
PC monitors will take VGA input but not TV signal input unless it has a TV adaptor, and not all of them are that effective in this case due to the way the screen is addressed.
a) It is a hassle. b) It is an expensive modification. c) It invalidates the warranty. d) It reduces its resale value. e) It may be required to watch TV in the future. f) There is no requirement to do so.
Christian.
Yes you are perfectly right about the original question, my apologies. However it moved on to CCTV. As this is my 3rd posting on ANY Google forum please give me a bit of leeway! And as I do know a bit about CCTV, I thought someone might benefit from that. Putting your name at the bottom of a ligitimate post is not spamming as I know it, it is proving that I know what I am talking about, & giving credibility to my posts (hopefully).
I also noticed I have posted in the middle of a thread - didn't know you could do that! I have so much to learn..
PaulR, Security inStore.
Just so you know, this is not a Google forum. Usenet has been around for a long time (longer than the World Wide Web, so certainly longer than Google) - Google just provide a convenient front end to it. Sometimes posts made from Google's fontend seem to break things for those of using more traditional means of accessing the groups. It *may* be better for you to get an account with
It would if there was a law requiring all knifes or there use to be licensed....
Correct, but that is not the point.
Untrue.
Colours will be way out though, unless you have a high grade monitor designed for graphics / colour correction work. Cheaper to buy two WS TV's and a licence !...
That will take at least a couple of years for them to have a drinkable product and it can't be guaranteed even then.
I'm saving £2 coins (as John Peel did) for my wake, lots and lots of champagne!
Mary
Something not uncommon on this list Paul so don't worry ;-)
To me, the company name would show
Nor me .. ?
However, as this is my third post ever here, please
You carry on Paul .. ;-)
Need a couple of Sony CCTV colour monitors and brackets by any chance .. ? '-)
All the best ..
T i m
"Mary Fisher" wrote | > If you don't reappear on ukfdm soon they're going to start | > fermenting mead for the wake ... | That will take at least a couple of years for them to have a | drinkable product and it can't be guaranteed even then.
By then Retro Drinks will probably be all the rage and there'll be sachets of Instant Mead - just add water and use the jam programme in a breadmaker. Here on ukdiy the usual suspects will be boasting how they've made mead in a heatbank, and the usual nutter will be putting two combi boilers in his beehives.
| I'm saving £2 coins (as John Peel did) for my wake, lots and lots of | champagne!
You shouldn't say things like that. It could tip some homicidal champagne fetishist over the edge ...
Owain
........... one keyboard please!
You'l ... er ... he'll have to wait. There are only four coins in the box to date. Cava won't be allowed.
Mary
^^^^ ^^^^
Looking at your command of the English language (above), it is no wonder that you cannot differentiate between, for example, CAN, MAY, MUST, COULD., SHOULD. By the way, if you can define and post proof of the meaning of these words, you might be found a lower order of respect in the uk.diy news group again. Right now, your esteem is down below the spammers of the internet.
I have had to use the written English language for nigh on 30 years in my career in the aerospace industry. This industry is renown for the clarity of the written word, unlike your loose interpretation of the W.T.A as applied to an 'installed piece of equipment'.
The Act is very precise and your interpretation of it beggars belief.
Dave
Typical of someone who has lost the argument, attack the others use of language or grammar....
considered
Thanks Tim. I don't do Sony usually, but can get them if you really want. Or, theses are an excellent alternative:
I would suggest that it is you that has lost the argument. Not I. LOL
The non understanding of language and grammar are the things that make myths of law and obscure the facts.
I reiterate, differentiate between, for example, CAN, MAY, MUST, COULD., SHOULD.
Dave
It's worth reading the FAQ at
As to 'a Private Message function' - uk.d-i-y is a Usenet newsgroup. Far and away the best way of taking part here is to use a newsgroup reading program. Mozilla Thunderbird (download for free at
HTH - Stefek
Well, without going over old ground, read the said Act and learn the meaning an use of the words OR & AND.
Which you are other have spouted plenty, you are the one posting myths.
NO, you differentiate between INSTALL, USE and the word AND./
Install OR use.
Install AND use.
Which of the two 'quotes' above has been quoted from the said Act and which one is pure myth ?....
Indeed. It's called "email".
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.