One has only to look at the examination papers to see that there is an enormous decline in standards. I was doing some comparisons just recently.
The amount of measurement and examination has certainly increased dramatically in the last generation, but one should not confuse that with quality of education or the level and type of learning achieved.
The type and purpose of education should be fitted to the needs and aptitude of the student, not delivered as a one-size-fits-all.
People have not changed genetically in the last generation, but the reality is that only some will benefit from a university education focussed on some content but more importantly on how to think, how to handle information and how to address problems. Others will benefit from something with more vocational focus as used to be provided by polytechnics, some from technical college and others from practical apprenticeships.
Now every educational establishment wants to call itself a university and the government to have 50% of the population going to one whether it suits them or not. This is a complete nonsense. I looked recently at the prospectus of a local educational establishment that used to be a reasonable technical college and is now a "university". One of the degree courses included an item on flower arranging. I don't think that there is anything wrong in learning flower arranging, but to suggest that it needs a "degree course" is ridiculous. It is this type of nonsense that is undermining the achievement of students by letting them be fooled into some feel-good thing that bears no relationship to what the economy requires or indeed the students themselves.
The model of having student loans etc. rather than grants based on the ability to pay is a separate issue and another nonsense.
Again the one-size-fits-all mentality ends up not serving the needs of anybody. Availability of quality university education has declined, as has that of the apprencticeship.