I would, especially if the properties were planned for gas CH.
As someone pointed out, the (ESI) planning standard when installing new services on an estate was R-Y-B-B-Y-R-R-Y-B and so on. I can't remember the theory now, but this gives better load distribution than R-Y-B-R-Y-B-R-Y-B.
Dunno if it's still the case but 4 way service joints were generally the maximum, due to the physical limitations of making the connections inside the joint.
If the houses were gas CH then an individual service could well be looped to the next property, especially if the properties were mirrored so the meter positions of adjoining properties are close together. Distribution of phases along the main then becomes R-R-Y-Y-B-B-B-B-Y-Y-R-R-R-R-Y-Y etc.
This would be most prevalent in high density housing developments. Lower density, the dwellings are obviously spread out more, and it becomes less easy to maintain the sequence depending on mains cable routing.