LED Fluoresecent replacements ????

What's the latest re replacing 6 foot / 70 watt T8 fluorescent tubes with a direct replacement LED equivalent? When I last looked a year or too it was far too expensive despite the undoubted saving of electricity consumption.

I have in excess of 72 tubes in my workshop, each are 6 foot / 70 watt T8's so the lighting load is significant. I've just had to buy a new box of tubes, but at £3.25 each they are dramatically cheaper than the LED versions - lowest I could find were over £20 each.

.. anyone know any different or have personal experience ?????????????

Andrew

Reply to
Andrew Mawson
Loading thread data ...

Are LEDs that much better than the best fluorescent, even now?

Reply to
cl

Quick google says 32w instead of 70w - so multiply that 38w saving by 72 tubes, and that's a _saving_ of nearly 3kw!

72 x 6ft tubes? How big IS this "workshop"...?
Reply to
Adrian

Quick google says 32w instead of 70w - so multiply that 38w saving by 72 tubes, and that's a _saving_ of nearly 3kw!

72 x 6ft tubes? How big IS this "workshop"...?

Not big enough !!!

Andrew

Reply to
Andrew Mawson

Sounds impressive! :-)

Is there a photo?

Reply to
pamela

Wrong sort of lights? Is the roof too low to use discharge lamps? You get more than 20000 lumen from a 250w metal halide lamp.

Reply to
dennis

Metal halide lamps are nowhere near as efficient as even fluorescent tubes.

Reply to
harry

There's a lot of mileage in splitting your lighting into zones so you only switch on the lights needed. Even pull switches for individual lights.

You could think about electronic ballasts, most of the loss from fluorescen t lights comes from conventional switch start ballasts. This brings them up to near LED efficiency and prolongs tube life.

Also make sure lights are correctly positioned over benches etc.

Not all areas need the same lighting levels. Eg walkways need less light th an over benches. So don't necessarily go for all tubes to be the same size or spacing.

Often lights are mounted far too high.

You might be able to halve your lighting bill just by these means.

Reply to
harry

At the moment with that lot, you may find that the outlay is worth it, but what nobody knows as yet is whether the leds are truly reliable and also will the rather more focussed light and the different collour temperature affect the people working in this factory at all. I would definitely equip a somewhat smaller area first if possible. Also did I not read some time agao that electronic ballasts and good old fashioned tubes were still pretty good value? Also, what about the loading on half cycles? I seem to recall the cruder leds tended to only use half cycles, though this does seem to be a bit stupid, if true. Brian

Reply to
Brian-Gaff

I think they are, yes.

IIRC LEDS are a tad more efficient. And I certainly prefer the light quality.

If anyone knows better Id also be interested in a moire definitive answer.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

I prefer LEDs and also they're available at 4000 - 4500K eqiv. - just right for a good light without being blueish.

Reply to
PeterC

Don't be offended, but in this light fingered age I'm never too keen displaying my toys :(

Andrew

Reply to
Andrew Mawson

Already installed and have been for the last 6 years. Capital cost of replacement too excessive

Andrew

Reply to
Andrew Mawson

Already done at original installation - split into 6 banks

Andrew

Reply to
Andrew Mawson

Not a factory Brian, it's my hobby workshop - only me intermittently working in it :)

Andrew

Reply to
Andrew Mawson

With 72 tubes, at least you should be able to see them!

When they are all working, we have 8 fluorescent tubes in our kitchen.

Reply to
GB

I'd worked that out. Otherwise, you'd have to have a humongous switch just to turn the lights on and off.

How much of a PITA is it to order in the tubes and replace them when they fail? Your time might be a significant consideration, and LEDs last far longer.

My experience is that when the fluorescents in the kitchen start to fail, it's worthwhile replacing all of them in one go. That way we get an even light, and it saves getting the ladder out just to replace one or two tubes. Also, new tubes are brighter.

Reply to
GB

We only have two in ours ... and 4 in the workshop. ;-(

But there is an up side, just think how cheap it would be for me to convert them to LED. ;-)

Cheers, T i m

Reply to
T i m

Well, obviously... Duh...

My triple garage is on two two-tube and two single-tube 4ft, with four single-tube 2ft at low level in the bay with the ramp - daylight tubes in them all. Then, when I get the workbenching in place, I'll figure some task lighting around there. So that's 600sqft with 32ft of tube. And you've got 400ft more of tube!

Have to admit, I'd not even thought about whether LED "tubes" were available - I know there's been various discussions about retro-fitting them into the standard flouro fittings in our '80s camper, where battery space is limited so off-grid power saving is an issue.

Reply to
Adrian

No offense taken. I understand.

Reply to
pamela

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.