I live in a maisonette built in the 60s. The front door is wooden, with glass top and bottom. The glass is held in with beading not putty. When I moved in last year, it hadn't been refurbished or reglazed since the place was built. I considered getting a new door, as several neighbours have done, but decided instead to keep the original and get it reglazed.
I went to a local glazier, chose a pattern (stippolyte I believe it's called) and asked their advice about how thick the glass could be. I wanted it to be as thick as possible for security reasons however the glaziers said it wouldn't make any difference as any glass could be shattered just as easily. Didn't know that before.
They sent someone round to have a look and measure. He said they could fit double-glazing of a certain thickness. They quoted £215 for the work and today they have been and done it. But I'm not very happy because it turns out there is a metal strip all around which is visible. The fitters said it was because of the depth of the rebate. They said it was not possible to fit a double-glazed unit of that thickness, without the metal strip being visible, because the rebate was not deep enough.
It wasn't important to me to have double-glazing in the door, as it only opens into a stairway. If they had told me before hand that this metal strip would be visible with double-glazing, I would have asked for single-glazing. However, when I rang them up and said that, they said they don't do single-glazing. I feel that in that case they ought to have explained the situation to me and then I could have chosen to go elsewhere to get the door single-glazed.
Am I being unreasonable? I would really prefer it to be redone with single glazing so that there's no metal strip showing, but it seems as if that will have to be done by a different company. Any advice on the best and fairest (to all concerned) way of dealing with this problem? They are ringing back to discuss it later today. Appreciate any opinions.
Anna